Skip to main content

Non-resident companies: FBR issues separate procedures/conditions

The FBR has amended Rule 80B of Income Tax Rules, 2002 through an SRO.466(I)/2016 issued here on Thursday. The FBR has issued separate procedures/conditions for non-resident companies (having no Permanent Establishment in Pakistan) and a non-resident company having Permanent Establishment in Pakistan. According to the new procedure, a non-resident company having Permanent Establishment in Pakistan, required to be registered shall provide name of company; business address; accounting period; phone No of business; principal business activity; address of principal place of business; registration number and date of the branch with the Securities Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP); name and address of principal officer or authorised representative of the company; authority letter for appointment of principal officer or authorised representative of the company cell phone of principal officer or authorized representative of the company and email address of principal officer or authorized representative of the company.

A non-resident company not having Permanent Establishment in Pakistan, required to be registered shall provide name or company; business address in the foreign country; name and nationality of directors or trustees of the company; accounting period; name and address of authorized representative of the company; authority letter for appointment of authorized representative of the company; cell phone of authorized representative of the company; email address of authorized representative of the company; principal business activity and tax registration or incorporation document from concerned regulatory authorities of the foreign country.

Source: Business Recorder: FBR issues separate procedures/conditions


Wheeling of electricity: Nepra approves regulations

According to Nepra’s Wheeling of Electric Power Regulation 2016, a generation company can sell its electricity to Bulk Power Consumer (BPC) at any location in the country. The consumers will be required to pay the cost of transporting of electricity (wheeling) for using NTDC/DISCO system, in addition to the cost of generation, to be mutually agreed between the generator and BPCs.

Nepra’s spokesperson said that notification of Nepra Wheeling of Electric Power Regulations 2016 is an important milestone towards opening the market to small and medium sized generators which will encourage them to sell electricity to their potential buyers. DISCOs at the same time will be required to maintain and improve their service quality to retain their customers while they would also financially benefit by receiving wheeling charges paid by the generation companies. With the involvement of private sector generators at transmission and distribution levels, not only the economy will get a positive boost, it is expected that the load demand on the system will be reduced considerably, enabling DISCOs to reduce load shedding, the spokesperson added.

The “wheeling” or “wheeling services” means the use of the distribution system of the Disco for the transport of electric power. Official sources told The News, the wheeling meters with technical specification specified by the Disco will be installed at entry and exit points of DISCOs to measure the electrical power entering and exiting the Disco network. Now many BPCs, including real estate projects and industrial zones, can easily get uninterrupted power supply from a Genco that falls in the Disco jurisdiction.

Notification of Nepra Wheeling of Electric Power Regulations 2016 is an important milestone towards opening the market to small and medium size generators which will encourage them to sell electricity to their potential buyers. Discos at the same time will be required to maintain and improve their service quality to retain their customers while they would also financially benefit by receiving wheeling charges paid by the Gencos.

With the involvement of private sector generators at transmission and distribution levels, not only the economy will get a positive boost, it is expected that the load demand on the system will be reduced considerably, enabling Discos to reduce load shedding. One of the key features of the regulations is the facilitation of dedicated transmission/distribution infrastructure. Under this concept where technical limitations do not allow generation company, using Discos/transmission company’s network, it may construct a dedicated transmission or distribution system through its own expense to supply electric power to its authorised consumer.

The regulations on wheeling will go a long way in creating a competitive market which will benefit the consumers and all the stakeholders in the power sector of Pakistan. Discos are liable to offer non-discriminatory open access to its distribution and inter-connection services to the applicants. The Disco shall enter into a wheeling agreement with the applicant within 30 days of the acceptance of the application and a copy of the agreement shall be submitted to Nepra within seven days of execution of the agreement. The wheeler of power shall have the option of renewal after expiration of the original term of the agreement.

A Genco may construct a dedicated distribution system from its own expense to supply electrical power to its authorised bulk power purchasers (BPCs). Such dedicated distribution system shall be handed over to Disco for ownership, maintenance and operation. However, the cost incurred by the generation company for setting up the distribution system will be recovered by the generation company through the wheeling charges. The Disco shall not connect such dedicated distribution system to its other distribution network without the consent of Genco.

The Disco shall acknowledge the receipt of the application within three days of the receipt of the application if the same is complete and contains the requisite information for processing the application: provided that any application which is incomplete or is not accompanied by the required information shall be returned within three days of filing thereof, identifying in writing the deficiencies in the application and the applicant shall be given a reasonable time to re submit the application.

Source: Business Recorder – Excessive tax deducted from non-filers: law may be amended to allow adjustment


Investors discouraged: NEPRA proposes cut in solar, wind power tariffs

The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) has recommended a significant reduction in solar and wind power tariffs that may discourage future investment in renewable energy resources. The recommendation came after member tariff from Punjab, Khawaja Naeem, completed his tenure in Nepra. Taking a suo motu notice, the regulator has proposed a cut of Rs1.44 per unit in the tariff for solar power projects in Balochistan. The new price will be Rs9.45 per unit. It has also proposed a reduction of Rs1.53 per unit for solar projects in Punjab that will take the tariff to Rs10 per unit.

For wind power plants, Nepra proposed a hefty tariff reduction of Rs4.10 per unit. The new tariff will be Rs8.60 per unit. It has decided to set per megawatt cost of solar power at $1.8 and per megawatt cost of wind power at $1.93. Nepra also took the opinion of different experts who suggested that the tariffs should be reduced. Now, it has sought comments of stakeholders including the Ministry of Water and Power. It will announce its decision after holding a hearing.

Last year, foreign investors had warned the government and power regulator that they would stop work on solar power projects worth billions of dollars because of the cut in tariff. Prospective foreign investors, who have planned to establish solar energy projects in Pakistan, are increasingly worried over the proposed reduction in tariff – the high rate of which was a major incentive for them. They are also uncertain whether their projects would see the light of day, though they have invested millions of dollars in feasibility studies and acquired letter of intent from the government.

Source: The Tribune: Investors discouraged: NEPRA proposes cut in solar, wind power tariffs


Renewable energy: SBP revises financing scheme

The State Bank announced the scheme for financing power plants using renewable energy in 2009, with a view to promoting renewable energy projects in the country. Keeping the low utilisation of the scheme in view, the scope and financial mechanism have been revised to make it more attractive to borrowers and financing banks/DFIs.

Pakistan’s economy is currently facing the dual challenge of energy shortage and climate change. The inadequate supply of energy has severely impacted the growth of industries/businesses and the welfare of public in general. Similarly, the effects of climate change have been observed in the form of devastating floods, droughts, heat waves and changing weather patterns. These changes essentially inhibit our ability to develop sustainably. In order to overcome these challenges, the SBP decided to promote green banking, ie, use of indigenous
resources, especially renewable energy in order to ensure sustainable banking and development. For this purpose, the scheme has been amended based on the feedback received from various stakeholders. The scheme will provide concessionary financing for large renewable energy power projects as well as for small scale renewable energy solutions.

The scheme shall be available for power generated by using alternative/renewable energy sources (solar, wind, hydro, biogas, bio-fuels, bagasse cogeneration, and geothermal as fuel). Financing facilities under the scheme will be provided through all commercial banks and Development Finance Institutions (DFIs). The State Bank shall provide refinance to each bank/DFI on service charge (mark-up) basis in terms of Section 17 (2) (d) read with section 22 of State Bank of Pakistan Act 1956. Refinance shall be allowed to banks/DFIs by the concerned office(s) of SBP BSC (Bank) on submission of documents as may be required by State Bank of Pakistan.
Source: Business Recorder


38 amendments introduced to Finance Act

The government has introduced 38 new amendments to the Finance Act 2016, with most of them relating to income tax measures. Of all, 21 amendments are related to income tax measures, 15 to sales tax and two to federal excise duty (FED). These amendments will come into effect from July 1. Through the Finance Act 2016, the formula was amended to allow benefit of tax credit of 100 per cent for establishing a new industry in case of reduced equity–investment ratio of 70pc. Similar amendments were made to allow the tax credit, for equity investments on expansion of machinery or a new project.

It was also proposed that in the event of discontinuation of business within five years of availing credit, the tax credit will be deemed to have been wrongly allowed. The government has barred commissioner of income tax from determining fair market value of immoveable property. Under the amendment, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) will approve a panel of ‘valuers’ to determine fair market value.

The disputed clause regarding foreign trusts in the definition of a company has also been withdrawn. The government has empowered commissioners to issue notices if a taxpayer has not filed returns for the past 10 years. Earlier, the notice for any tax prior to five years could not be sent. Yet another amendment allows commissioner to recover only 25pc of the tax demand created in case an appeal before commissioner appeal is pending. The excess tax collected or deducted on account of higher rate for non-filers will be adjustable to the return filed for the relevant tax year only.

An explanation was introduced in the Finance Bill 2016 to calculate the limit of Rs50,000 to be aggregate withdrawals from all the bank accounts in a single day for withholding tax. Through the Finance Act 2016, the explanation has been further refined that the limit of Rs50,000 will be calculated on the basis of aggregate transactions, instead of aggregate withdrawals, from all bank accounts in a single day. The amendment has the effect that limit of cash withdrawals will still be calculated on a single-account single-day basis.

The exemption limit of income from gratuity from an approved gratuity scheme was further extended to Rs300,000 from Rs200,000. The government has introduced a 2-percentage-point reduction in tax rate for Shariah-compliant companies — 30pc for tax year 2016, 29pc for tax year 2017 and 28pc for tax year 2018 and onwards. The reduced rate will be available if the company is Shariah-compliant as per criteria of the SBP, the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan and the Federal Board of Revenue.

Source: Dawn: 38 amendments introduced to Finance Act


Property price to be fixed on market value for tax

Amendment in tax laws to streamline real estate investments; implementation from July 1.

An important amendment has been made to Section 68 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 through the Finance Act 2016, which will be effective from July 1.

Under the amendment, the property evaluation rate set by the provincial governments will no longer remain relevant. After that, all investors will have to get their properties evaluated through the valuers of the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) under a new mechanism. One or more valuers of the SBP will fix the real market value of the immovable property and refer it to the FBR Inland Revenue Department.

This amendment will do away with the informal economy or black economy in the real estate sector to a great extent. It will not only bring black money into the tax net but also put high penalties on tax evaders under Section 192-A. The penalties can amount to 100 percent of the evaded tax. These will be in addition to the additional tax imposed on the evaders.

Source: The News: Property price to be fixed on market value for tax


Company law changes in 2016

THE SMALL BUSINESS, ENTERPRISE AND EMPLOYMENT ACT 2015 (THE “ACT”)

The Act makes important changes to the law applying to UK companies and aims to deter illegal activity such as money laundering and tax evasion. Designed to improve transparency and trust around who owns and controls UK businesses, the Act aims to deter and sanction those who hide their interests. It will also simplify company filing requirements, reducing duplication and improving flexibility in dealings with Companies House.

SUMMARY OF KEY COMPANY LAW CHANGES AND DATES

People with Significant Control

UK companies will be required to maintain a register of persons with significant control (“PSCs”). This will be separate to the register of members, which currently records the company’s shareholders.

The aim is to ensure that individuals with significant beneficial interests, or other controlling rights in a company, are easily identifiable. A PSC is a person who:

  • Holds more than 25% of the company’s shares.
  • Holds more than 25% of the company’s voting rights.
  • Has the right to appoint or remove a majority of the board of directors.
  • Has significant influence or control over the company.
  • Has significant influence or control over a trust or partnership.

The government has issued guidance on the meaning of ‘significant influence or control’.

UK companies will have the responsibility of identifying PSCs and keeping an up-to-date PSC register at its registered office. PSCs will also be obliged to notify companies of their identities and relevant interest in the company. Annually submitted to Companies House, the PSC Register is to be accessible by the public (see ‘Annual Returns’).

Both companies and individuals will be subject to criminal penalties for failing to provide, or deliberately providing false, information. A company can also impose sanctions if its PSCs do not comply with their disclosure obligations.

The requirement to keep a PSC register came into force on 6 April 2016. Unquoted companies have been under such obligations since January 2016.

Annual Returns

Companies’ annual returns will no longer need filling.

Instead, there will be a requirement to ‘check and confirm’ the company information by filing a ‘confirmation statement’ and notifying Companies House of any changes if necessary at least once every 12 months.

The confirmation statement is due within 14 days of the end of the relevant review period i.e. the period of 12 months beginning on the day of the company’s incorporation and each period of 12 months beginning the day after the end of the previous review period (the due date).

Subject to this requirement, the company can choose to provide a confirmation statement at any point prior to the due date, in which case the next 12-month period will run from the day after the confirmation date (being the date specified in the confirmation statement).

PSC information must be submitted on the ‘confirmation statement’ similar to providing director’s details.

These changes and the requirement to send PSC information to Companies House are due to come into force in June 2016

Ban on Corporate Directors

It will not be possible for UK Companies to appoint companies and other corporate entities as directors, i.e. all directors must be natural persons. The aim is to restrict the use of corporate structures to hide illegal activity.

Companies affected have a one-year transitional period to appoint replacement directors and existing corporate directors will automatically cease to be directors one year after this prohibition has come into effect.

The company will need to make the necessary PSC register alterations and notifications at Companies House.

Having said that, following a public consultation undertaken by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills in April 2016, the government is considering exceptions to this proposed rule.

Indeed, the government has recognised that a company may appoint corporate directors for legitimate reasons and are considering the introduction of certain exceptions to the general ban. An exception that has been considered is that corporate directors will be allowed where the following two conditions are met:

  • All directors of the corporate director are individuals.
  • The law (if not UK law) under which the corporate director is appointed requires details of the individual officer of the corporate director to be accessible through a public register.

These provisions are due to come into force in October 2016

Optional information

Companies will deliver certain categories of optional information to Companies House.A consultation period will establish the types of information Companies House can hold. These might include:

  • Company trading addresses.
  • Number of employees.
  • An email address.
  • A phone number.

The criteria are yet to be decided, but any optional information sent to Companies House will be on a voluntary basis.

These changes are due to come into force late 2016/early 2017


The Bribery Act 2010

In January 2016 the first UK company to be prosecuted for corruption was sentenced to a fine of just over £1.3m, had over £800k confiscated and was ordered to pay £25k in prosecution costs; with two directors being convicted and sentenced (in 2015):

  • Christopher Smith received an 18-monthimprisonment sentence (suspended for two years) for two counts of corruptly agreeing to make payments, contrary to section 1(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1906 and ordered to carry out 250 hours of unpaid work. Further, he received a three-month curfew.
  • Nicholas Smith, the company’s sales and marketing director, received a three-year imprisonment sentencefor three counts of corruptly agreeing to make payments.

Further, both men received six-year bans on acting as company directors.

In his sentencing, the Judge stated, “Corruption of foreign officials is damaging to the country in which the corruption occurs is damaging to the reputation of UK business and, of course, in the market in which a business operates. It is anti-competitive.”

The conviction follows an SFO investigation into corrupt payments made to the company in return for the award of contracts.
The company was convicted under the old legislation as the offences pre-dated the Bribery Act 2010 (2010 Act).

OUR BRIEF

To outline the offences introduced by the 2010 Act and the penalties for committing them. To highlight the practical steps a business can take to avoid breaching the legislation.

What is bribery?

Anti-corruption organisation Transparency International defines bribery as “the offering, promising, giving, accepting or soliciting of an advantage as an inducement for an action which is illegal or a breach of trust.”

Who can receive a bribe?

It is a common misconception that the 2010 Act only outlaws the bribery of public officials. In fact, the 2010 Act is much wider, and applies to all entities that carry on business or parts of it business in the UK.

The reasons for introducing the 2010 Act

To strengthen the existing bribery and corruption laws in the UK.

The Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) had repeatedly criticised the UK system for being weak and ineffective compared with the more robust regimes in other countries, such as the US Foreign and Corrupt Practices Act.

The offences under the 2010 Act

Bribing another person

A person is guilty of this offence if they offer, promise or give a financial advantage or other advantage, to another person.In other words:

  • to bring about improper performance of a relevant function or activity; or
  • to reward a person for the improper performance of a relevant function or activity.

The types of function or activity that can be improperly performed include:

  • all functions of a public nature;
  • all activities connected with a business;
  • any activity performed in the course of a person’s employment; and
  • any activity performed by or on behalf of a body of persons.

The person performing such function or activity must be in a position of trust, and the expectation is that they carry out that function or activity impartiallyand in good faith.

It may not matter whether the person who offered the bribe is the same person that actually performs, or performed, the function or activity concerned.

The advantage can be offered, promised or given by the person themselves or by a third party.

Being bribed

The recipient or potential recipient of a bribe is guilty of this offence if they request, agree to receive or accept a financial or other advantage to perform a relevant function or activity improperly.

It does not matter whether it is the recipient or someone else through whom the recipient, who requests, agrees to receive or accepts the advantage. In addition, the advantage can be for the benefit of the recipient or another person.

Bribing a foreign public official

A person is guilty of this offence if they intend to influence an official in their capacity as a foreign public official.

The offence does not cover accepting bribes, only offering, promising or giving bribes.

Making the offer, promise or gift directly to the official, or via a third party, does not in fact matter.

Failing to prevent bribery

A commercial organisation is guilty of this offence if a person associated with it bribes another person, with the intention of obtaining or retaining business, or a business advantage, for the commercial organisation. The offence can be committed in the UK or overseas.

A business can avoid conviction if it can demonstrate that it had adequate procedures in place designed to prevent bribery.

What are the penalties for committing an offence?

The offences of bribing another person, receiving bribes and bribing a foreign public official are punishable on indictment either by an unlimited fine, imprisonment of up to ten years or both.

Note: Both a company and its directors could be subject to criminal penalties.

The offence of failure to prevent bribery is punishable on indictment by an unlimited fine.

Businesses convicted of corruption could find themselves permanently debarred from tendering for public sector contracts.

Receiving adverse publicity, if prosecuted for an offence, could damage your business’ reputation.

Practical steps to help avoid liability under the 2010 Act

Top level commitment

All senior managers and directors must understand they could be personally liable under the 2010 Act for offences committed by the business.

It is important that senior management lead the anti-bribery culture of a business, especially if the business wants to take advantage of the “adequate procedures” defence to the offence of failing to prevent bribery.

Risk assessment

Which potential risks could affect your business. For example, certain industry sectors (such as construction, energy, oil and gas, defence and aerospace, mining and financial services) and countries are associated with a greater risk of bribery. Think about:

  • what transactions you engage in;
  • who you transact with; and
  • how you conduct those transactions.

High-risk transactions include:

  • procurement and supply chain management;
  • involvement with regulatory relationships (e.g. licences or permits); and
  • charitable and political contributions.

Review how the business entertains potential customers, especially those from government agencies, state-owned enterprises or charitable organisations.

Routine or inexpensive corporate hospitality is unlikely to be a problem, but put clear guidelines in place.
If the business operates in foreign jurisdictions, always check local laws.

Implementing and communicating an anti-corruption code of conduct

Implement a code of conduct setting out clear, practical and accessible policies and procedures that apply to the entire business. Make sure you communicate the code effectively to all parts of the organisation.

Carry out background checks when dealing with third parties

A business will be liable if a person associated with it commits an offence on its behalf. Businesses should therefore review all of their relationships with any partners, suppliers and customers. For example, if an agent or distributor uses a bribe to win a contract for a business, that business could be liable.

Ensure you carry out background checks on any agents or distributors before you engage them.

Policies and procedures

Review any existing policies and procedures and update them if necessary. If the business does not have any policies or procedures in place, consider preparing them as a matter of urgency.

Effective implementation and monitoring

Consider introducing a compulsory training programme for all staff. If only a few employees operate in a high-risk area, consider targeting training at those employees.

Ensure you continually monitor anti-corruption policies and procedures are for compliance and effectiveness, both internally and externally.

Prevention is far better than cure

This is particularly so with the 2010 Act. Introducing and implementing effective policies, procedures and training is the best way to avoid problems in this area, and the best defence if the SFO come knocking at the door.

If you would like further advice or assistance on any of the matters raised in this note, please feel free to contact us.


Investor Alert

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services are jointly issuing this Investor Alert to warn individual investors about fraudulent investment scams that exploit the Immigrant Investor Program, also known as “EB-5.”

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Office of Investor Education and Advocacy and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) are aware of investment scams targeting foreign nationals who seek to become permanent lawful U.S. residents through the Immigrant Investor Program (“EB-5”). In close coordination with USCIS, which administers the EB-5 program, the SEC has taken emergency enforcement action to stop allegedly fraudulent securities offerings made through EB-5.

The EB-5 program provides certain foreign investors who can demonstrate that their investments are creating jobs in this country, with a potential avenue to lawful permanent residency in the United States. Business owners apply to USCIS to be designated as “regional centers” for the EB-5 program. These regional centers offer investment opportunities in “new commercial enterprises” that may involve securities offerings. Through EB-5, a foreign investor who invests a certain amount of money that is placed at risk, and creates or preserves a minimum number of jobs in the United States, is eligible to apply for conditional lawful permanent residency. Toward the end of the two-year period of conditional residency, the foreign investor is eligible to apply to have the conditions on their lawful permanent residency removed, if he or she can establish that the job creation requirements have been met. Foreign investors who invest through EB-5, however, are not guaranteed a visa or to become lawful permanent residents of the United States. For more details, read the EB-5 Immigrant Investor section of USCIS’s website.


LNG-based power plants: Government flouts least cost generation policy

The adverse impact of a ‘seller-favouring’ USD 16b deal with Qatar for import of liquefied natural gas (LNG) has started appearing, as the government has approved a new implementation agreement for three LNG-fired power plants, which violates the least cost generation policy. The implementation agreement has been prepared under compulsion of consistent LNG supply by Qatar. This will make it binding for the three public sector power plants to produce 3,600 megawatts of electricity around the clock, irrespective of being economically viable or not. The downside risk is that the cost of generation will double once crude oil prices start increasing in the international markets.

The Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) of the cabinet approved the implementation agreement on Tuesday for running the LNG-based power plants, two of them being set up by the federal government and the third by the Punjab government. These power plants will be located in Punjab at Bhikki, Balloki and Haveli Bahadur Shah. The ECC approved the draft implementation agreement for imported LNG-based power projects in the public sector, said the Ministry of Finance. The government has already amended the Private Power Infrastructure Board (PPIB) law to make it possible to administer these plants. The ECC also approved amendments to power purchase agreements of three independent power producers (IPPs) to bind them to make payments for LNG supply within 10 days – down from the current period of 55 days.

The implementation agreement of the three LNG power plants will bind the federal government to pick all the risks associated with supply of the imported gas.

According to the approved arrangement, these plants will have to be operated on “must-run basis owing to the peculiarity of the mechanism of importing LNG”, according to a summary of the Ministry of Water and Power. The must-run policy would violate the merit order that was aimed at ensuring that low-cost power generation plants are run first, said Shahid Sattar, former member energy of the Planning Commission.

Pakistan recently approved a 15-year (2016-2031) government-to-government deal with Qatar that requires Islamabad to buy the entire volume of LNG or pay the full price, if it does not lift the whole quantity.

The implementation agreement is also in contrast to such agreements signed with the IPPs. In this arrangement, the government is the producer and buyer of electricity. It has picked all financial obligations associated with LNG supplies.

This was very unusual and eventually the government would pass on the buck to the electricity consumers, officials said. According to the implementation agreement, in the absence of re-gasified LNG, these power plants will be run on high-speed diesel and the price differential on account of high cost of generation and payment for LNG supplies, which was not picked because of any reason, will be the responsibility of the federal government. The ECC also authorised the PPIB to make and approve any project-specific amendments to the implementation agreement required during negotiations. The PPIB board has also been authorised to make amendments, if required, to the agreements to comply with the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority’s tariff determinations. The ECC approved amendments to the agreement between the Central Power Purchasing Agency and three IPPs – Rousch, Fauji Kabirwala and Davis Energen – to bind them to make payments to LNG suppliers within 10 days. The arrangement is also aimed at ensuring that Qatar Gas is paid within 10 days of the delivery of gas.

Source: The Tribune: LG-based power plants: Government flouts least cost generation policy


Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch
Sending

News/Insight

  • Lexology Getting The Deal Through – Private Equity (Fund Formation) 2021
    Private Equity (Fund Formation) 2021: United Arab Emirates (Published in April 2021)


    Read more
  • Lexology Getting The Deal Through – Private Equity (Transactions) 2021
    Private Equity (Transactions) 2021: United Arab Emirates (Published in April 2021)


    Read more
  • LexisNexis Foreign Investment Law Guide 外国投资法指南 2018–2019
    For an update on foreign investment practices around the world with an Asia-Pacific focus, please review the LexisNexis Foreign Investment Law Guide 2018 -2019 eBook


    Read more
  • DFSA enhances its Collective Investment Funds Regime
    Following the consultation period on a number of proposed legislative changes that were set out in Consultation Paper No. 115, the DFSA has made amendments to the Collective Investment Law 2010 and the DFSA Rulebook.


    Read more
  • LexisNexis Mergers & Acquisitions Guide 2019
    The sixth annual complimentary guide to understanding M&A practices around the world with an Asia-Pacific focus.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Global Law Experts Recommended Firm 2017

  • Chambers Asia Pacific 2016

  • Legal 500 Leading Firm 2015

  • IFLR1000 Financial & Corporate Top Tier Law Firm 2015

  • Chambers Asia Pacific 2015

Read more