Skip to main content

News story

February 7, 2020

Workplace mental wellbeing

Workplace mental wellbeing is a top concern among employers, according to European-wide research.

February’s “Time to Talk Day” allowed employers to review policy and culture against best practices in employee mental well-being.

According to the World Health Organization, lost productivity due to mental illness costs the global economy US$ 1 trillion annually. In the UK, workplace mental illness is estimated to cost 2% of GDP. The latest statistics from the Health & Safety Executive (HSE) show that work-related stress, depression or anxiety now represents 44% of all work-related ill health and 54% of working days lost – a total of 12.8 million days in 2018/19.

The continuing rise in such figures highlights the need for companies to increase their focus on mental health to ensure employee wellbeing and avoid complaints or litigation from staff. One of the initiatives designed to encourage such dialogue is “Time to Talk Day”, which took place on 6 February 2020.

Workload pressures, tight deadlines, too much responsibility, and a lack of managerial support were the main reasons given as the cause of workplace stress in the HSE findings. Employers have a legal duty to protect employees from stress at work by undertaking a risk assessment and acting on it.

In some instances, when an employee suffers from a mental health condition, which has a substantial impact and long-term effect on day-to-day activity, it may be classified as a disability. If it is, an employer must take positive action under the Equality Act 2010 and consider whether reasonable adjustments can be made. Furthermore, the Act makes it unlawful for an employer to treat a person with a disability less favourably because of their disability unless there is a justification for doing so.

Depression or anxiety is not enough on its own to meet the definition of ‘disability’ under the Act. It is sensible to take legal advice on the definition of disability under the Act and the circumstances of each case. Whatever the extent of an individual’s mental health concerns, the employer is responsible for taking reasonable care of all employees.

In extreme situations, mental health may result in work-related suicide attempts. Men working in construction are shown to have an increased risk, and union officials have said the Hinkley Point nuclear power station project is grappling with a mental health crisis. According to the Unite Union, there were ten suicide attempts in the first four months of 2019, as well as a rise in the number of people off sick with stress, anxiety and depression and an increase in workers suffering from mental distress.

Our employment partner, Karen Cole, explains:

“Such reports are a tragic reflection of the long-term impact that stress in the workplace may have on workers. Fortunately, this situation is not common, but demonstrates why it is so important for organisations to face up to the challenge of employee wellbeing. Employees need to feel supported and not worried about what will happen if they speak up. That comes down to having the right culture in the organisation.”

She added:

“A good starting point is to review processes and practice to see whether organisations provide support and protection from any unfair or discriminatory treatment. If there are gaps, then make sure they are closed. In the same way that employees with physical issues should feel free to speak out, so should anyone with mental health issues”

Organisations should look at the resource pack offered by “Time to Talk” on how to deal with mental health issues in the workplace.

Should you require further assistance concerning policies and procedures in your business, contact Karen Cole today.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more

What they say...

  • Anon, April 2025
    “Whistleblowing dismissal claim and settlement negotiations I can not speak highly enough of this firm and [Patrick Simpson], they were not only understanding of my case needs they also worked with the up most integrity and professionalism to e

  • Patrick, April 2025
    “We had a long process handled by Charlotte & James from RIAA Barker Gillette. Even though we were outside the UK Charlotte & James we’re always available and we developed a great working relationship with them.They gave sound advice,

  • Leann Paris, March 2025
    “From the beginning to the end, the support we have received throughout the case with all the staff members has been far more than we expected, we got kept up to date with every single matter, I have had stressful few years but Charlotte and he

  • C Smith, March 2025
    “As executor of a will it was a relief for a solicitor to act on my behalf as though no disputes it was still a lengthy and complex process. It was dealt with mostly by Charlotte B. who kept me informed at all times. She explained the process c

  • Marc, March 2025
    “RIAA Barker Gillette were engaged to handle a real estate transaction with unusual circumstances. As a non-UK resident unfamiliar with English conveyancing procedures, I felt completely satisfied with the depth of the information and explanati

Read more
Send this to a friend