Skip to main content

Insight article

July 17, 2023

What is the reasonableness test?

The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA) protects consumers and parties with lesser bargaining power from unfair or unreasonable contractual provisions.

A crucial part of UCTA is the so-called “reasonableness test”, which assesses the fairness and enforceability of specific contract terms.

Which terms does the reasonableness test apply to?

The reasonableness test primarily applies to exclusion and limitation clauses which seek to limit or exclude liability for breach of contract, negligence or other claims. 

The courts may deem such clauses unfair or unenforceable if they fail the reasonableness test. The test considers such factors as the following when evaluating a contractual term:

  1. The relative bargaining power of the parties
    The test considers any power imbalance between the parties to determine whether one party can impose unfair terms on the other.
  2. Knowledge and awareness of the term
    It assesses whether the party affected by the term had sufficient opportunity to understand and appreciate its implications.
  3. Inducements or representations made
    The test considers any inducements, representations, or special circumstances that influenced the inclusion of the term in the contract.
  4. The subject matter of the contract
    The court can assess the term’s reasonableness in light of the nature and purpose of the contract, including the risks and liabilities typically associated with such agreements.
  5. Availability of alternatives
    The test examines whether the party imposing the term offered alternatives, allowed negotiation or if they presented the contract as a “take it or leave it” proposition.
  6. Public interest
    The reasonableness test may consider the public interest or any social or economic implications of the specific term.

The test seeks to balance safeguarding the interests of parties with less bargaining power while still acknowledging the legitimate business interests of all parties involved.

If the courts deem a contractual term unreasonable under UCTA, they may modify the term or declare it unenforceable. this can result in the affected party not being bound by that particular term. They may be entitled to seek remedies or adjustments to the term to align it with reasonableness standards.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the reasonableness test allows parties to challenge unfair or oppressive contractual provisions and promotes fairness in commercial transactions.

Victoria Holland can review your commercial agreements and provide tailored advice based on the specific circumstances of a contract. He can help you navigate the complexities of UCTA. Victoria can ensure you thoroughly understand the reasonableness test and its implications in any given situation. Call him today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more
  • Navigating the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023: What it means for your business
    The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (the Act) represents a significant shift in the UK's approach to combating economic crime, improving corporate transparency, and anti-mo


    Read more
  • Blowing kisses, not boundaries
    Tribunal clears air on workplace etiquette.


    Read more
  • Estate planning: How not to make mincemeat of it!
    The High Court has confirmed that a will handwritten on the back of two cardboard food packages is legally binding.


    Read more

What they say...

  • C Smith, March 2025
    “As executor of a will it was a relief for a solicitor to act on my behalf as though no disputes it was still a lengthy and complex process. It was dealt with mostly by Charlotte B. who kept me informed at all times. She explained the process c

  • Marc, March 2025
    “RIAA Barker Gillette were engaged to handle a real estate transaction with unusual circumstances. As a non-UK resident unfamiliar with English conveyancing procedures, I felt completely satisfied with the depth of the information and explanati

  • Leigh, March 2025
    “Instructed Martin on my first property purchase. He was a delight to work with, kept me informed and updated regularly. It was an incredibly smooth and quick process. Couldn’t be happier.”

  • Ms Brownell, March 2025
    “Patrick was amazing from start to finish. He made the process so easy, and explained each step in detail ahead of time so I’d understand what would happen and when. He was incredibly organized and noted every detail, calling out things t

  • Roman Cassini, February 2025
    “Peter Wright – highly recommended solicitor, helped us though a complicated flat sale with consummate professionalism.”

Read more
Send this to a friend