Skip to main content

Insight article

April 21, 2020

Suspension of rent because of a lockdown

Often business people are somewhat disinterested in the content of a lease of commercial premises, but the lockdown measures resulting from the Coronavirus have prompted varied questions that are likely to leave a long-term print on the wording of leases.

The most common question has been, “Do I have to carry on paying my rent?” or conversely “Must my tenant still pay the rent?” Typically, the answer is yes. The rent is still payable, as nobody in the real estate world foresaw the lockdown.

Such has been its severity that lawyers will be expected to address the possibility of repetition in future lease negotiations.

For many years it has been customary in leases to stipulate that rent will be suspended and not payable if the property is damaged by fire or another insured risk. Note that a precursor to the usual relief application is physical damage or destruction of the bricks and mortar, and the virus has not caused such damage.

Tenants will likely try to negotiate the inclusion of wording which extends the suspension of rent to the period of any lockdown resulting from a future pandemic or similar event. Landlords may or may not resist successfully. The leap in mindset has already been done in respect of what lawyers commonly call ‘uninsured risks’, but this has been relatively easy to concede because of the rarity of its application. Fears regarding the virus have spilt over into fear of a second pandemic once the current one is over. It is likely to be regarded as a clear and present risk.

Landlords may look to offset the risk against insurance cover, as they do with a loss of rent insurance in case of damage by fire (mostly paid for by tenants).

Doubtless, insurers are already reflecting on new products and extensions to business interruption policies due to the pandemic. Press stories on the reliability of claims on such policies for the current virus leave one with the impression that the endeavours of the insurance industry may continue to exploit the fine line which sells policies but does not necessarily pay out on them.

Insurers have to make profits, and the hard truth may be that the effect of the pandemic is so huge that its widest effects are uninsurable. It falls to the government to be an insurer of last resort (a role that it undertook as a reaction and not by design regarding COVID-19). It may not be beyond the limits of the insurance industry to develop a loss of rent policy for the real estate world, which complements a clause for suspension of rent in case of a pandemic lockdown. Time will tell.

What will become normal practice, in respect of the sharing or bearing of risk between landlord and tenants for rent payment for properties that are not useable because of the pandemic lockdown, is uncertain. It will surely be the subject of active discussion in future lease negotiations.

Call John Gillette today if you have a question about the terms of your lease of commercial premises or any future lease.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more
  • Navigating the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023: What it means for your business
    The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (the Act) represents a significant shift in the UK's approach to combating economic crime, improving corporate transparency, and anti-mo


    Read more
  • Blowing kisses, not boundaries
    Tribunal clears air on workplace etiquette.


    Read more
  • Estate planning: How not to make mincemeat of it!
    The High Court has confirmed that a will handwritten on the back of two cardboard food packages is legally binding.


    Read more

What they say...

  • C Smith, March 2025
    “As executor of a will it was a relief for a solicitor to act on my behalf as though no disputes it was still a lengthy and complex process. It was dealt with mostly by Charlotte B. who kept me informed at all times. She explained the process c

  • Marc, March 2025
    “RIAA Barker Gillette were engaged to handle a real estate transaction with unusual circumstances. As a non-UK resident unfamiliar with English conveyancing procedures, I felt completely satisfied with the depth of the information and explanati

  • Leigh, March 2025
    “Instructed Martin on my first property purchase. He was a delight to work with, kept me informed and updated regularly. It was an incredibly smooth and quick process. Couldn’t be happier.”

  • Ms Brownell, March 2025
    “Patrick was amazing from start to finish. He made the process so easy, and explained each step in detail ahead of time so I’d understand what would happen and when. He was incredibly organized and noted every detail, calling out things t

  • Roman Cassini, February 2025
    “Peter Wright – highly recommended solicitor, helped us though a complicated flat sale with consummate professionalism.”

Read more
Send this to a friend