Skip to main content

News story

May 20, 2017

Small suppliers to get info on big companies’ payment performance

New regulations designed to help small businesses get paid on time came into force in April, with a requirement for larger companies to publish information about how long they take to pay suppliers.

The requirement affects those companies and limited liability partnerships (LLPs) exceeding the thresholds to qualify as a ‘medium-sized’ company under the Companies Act 2006. The new regulations, therefore, apply to all companies who, at the date of their last two balance sheets, satisfy two or more of the following criteria:

  1. have an annual turnover of £36 million or more;
  2. have a balance sheet total of £18 million or more; or
  3. have an average of 250 or more employees during the year.

From 6 April 2017, those qualifying will be required to publish information on a Government website about their payment practices and policies and how they have performed against them, including the average time taken to pay suppliers. They will also be required to update the information every six months.

The new regulations aim to tackle concerns about the adverse treatment of smaller suppliers by larger, more powerful customers through increased transparency and scrutiny.

The Reporting on Payment Practices and Performance Regulations 2017 came into force as part of the Small Business Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 and applies to public, private and listed companies and LLPs through a separate set of Regulations.

Businesses are not required to report in their first financial year. Those in their second year must check the requirements against their single first financial year.

Reporting is required for parent companies and LLPs if the aggregate group figures exceed the thresholds. Any company or LLP within a group that satisfies the test individually must report separately on its own payment practices and performance.

Our former head of corporate and commercial, Veronica Hartley, explains:

“It’s important that larger businesses check whether they are required to report under the regulations. They must then keep an eye on the thresholds as these will be updated over time. Smaller businesses can ask new customers whether they are required to report and, if they are, check out payment performance as part of their pre-contract checks.”

She added:

“It’s worth remembering that there are other existing measures already available to tackle late payment, including the option of claiming interest and recovery charges. It’s worth checking that existing contract terms don’t undermine those rights with something less advantageous.”

Under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998, commercial businesses are expected to pay their supplier invoices within 30 days unless they have agreed to a longer time limit of no more than 60 days. Further, all public bodies must pay suppliers within 30 days, except for some specific or devolved activities.

Statutory interest can be applied with a fixed sum of between £40 and £100 (depending on the sum owed) for the cost of recovering the late payment. The interest is currently set at 8% above the Bank of England’s base rate. It starts to run automatically 30 days after either receipt of the supplier’s invoice or the date of receiving or accepting the goods or services (whichever is the later). You can agree to a longer period for payment, but if it’s more than 60 days, it must be fair to both businesses. Unless such a ‘reasonable’ longer period has been agreed upon, purchasers must confirm that goods or services conform with the contract within 30 days.

Late payment legislation does not have to be referenced in trading terms as it will apply automatically in any commercial relationship unless alternative provisions have been set out in the contract.

Call our head of corporate and commercial, Victoria Holland, today.

Note: This is not legal advice. It provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more

What they say...

  • Henry, April 2025
    “We have purchased flats before with 2 different solicitors who were unable to help us this time. Martin came highly recommended and are we glad. He was very professional in every way: knowledgeable, approachable, he has a friendly manner, very

  • Megan Purcell-Jones, April 2025
    “Charlotte was extremely diligent and thorough. She talked us through the process of making our wills and listened to and understood our needs and the complexities involved. Extremely patient and very clear.”

  • Hena, April 2025
    “Great experience, Patrick was very clear and gave time to explain the legal processes. Friendly and professional communication made me feel comfortable asking questions, received great legal advice.”

  • Michael Constable, April 2025
    “I wanted to revise my will and appoint RIAA Barker Gillette as my Executor and Trustees. This was handled very efficiently and professionally. It helped that I had agreed a fixed fee in advance.” Review left for: Herman Cheung

  • Anon, April 2025
    “Whistleblowing dismissal claim and settlement negotiations I can not speak highly enough of this firm and [Patrick Simpson], they were not only understanding of my case needs they also worked with the up most integrity and professionalism to e

Read more
Send this to a friend