Skip to main content

News story

May 9, 2022

Ensure equality in residential tenancies

For residential landlords, identity checks on prospective tenants can be challenging and the penalties harsh for getting it wrong; but trying to avoid tenants with complex immigration status is not an option, as this opens the way to claims of unlawful discrimination.

The obligation to conduct so-called ‘right to rent’ checks were first imposed on landlords, or their agents, under the Immigration Act 2014, and later updated in the Immigration Act 2016. The aim was to prevent individuals without lawful immigration status from accessing the private rented sector. The checks apply to all prospective tenants over the age of 18 for a new residential let, whether via a private landlord, lettings agent or an owner-occupier renting to lodgers.

Since the initial checks were set out, the requirements have regularly been updated to reflect changes in the process and digitalisation of services. Most recently a new set of requirements came into force on 6 April 2022, outlining both online and manual right to work checks, depending on the status of the tenant. This includes changes to the way in which the Biometric Residence Card (BRC), Biometric Residence Permit (BRP) and Frontier Worker Permit (FWP) can be used to evidence a holder’s right to rent.

Previously landlords could accept a physical BRP, BRC or FWP as valid proof if it showed an expiry date within the term of the tenancy, but now this must be checked using the Home Office online service. Home Office online checks are also required for individuals who have only digital proof of their immigration status in the UK.

The checks can be extremely complex for some non-UK citizens and a recent House of Commons review of the regulation of private rented housing found 25% of landlords were unwilling to rent to non-British passport holders. But any landlord thinking to avoid their obligations, by deterring prospective foreign tenants or favouring those who are apparently British, could find themselves subject to action under anti-discriminatory measures and the Equality Act 2010.

Landlords who discriminate on the basis of a protected characteristic, such as race or racial grounds, including ‘colour, nationality, and ethnic or national origins’ could find themselves facing a claim for an uncapped level of damages if a prospective tenant with the right to live in the UK is rejected on these grounds. Or if a landlord publishes a discriminatory advertisement or instructs their agent to discriminate, the Equality and Human Rights Commission can bring proceedings.

When faced with all the small print and knowing there are fines or even imprisonment, for incorrectly carrying out right to rent checks, a landlord may think it simpler to look for a tenant who is more easily checked out, but that path is equally risky.

To avoid discrimination, every prospective tenant should be treated exactly the same way, so no one is discouraged or excluded, either directly or indirectly, because of a known or perceived protected characteristic. The right to rent checks should also be undertaken consistently, whether or not a landlord believes someone is a British citizen.

Getting guidance and regular updates on how to manage the checks is ideal, as things can change all the time. As well as the new requirements from 6 April, we recently saw the government release special rules regarding the right to rent checks for Ukrainian nationals escaping the conflict.

It’s also a good idea to adopt the Government checklist and follow the code that is set out, as that will demonstrate best practice and provide a statutory excuse against liability if you are found to have rented to anyone disqualified by reason of immigration status.

Property partner, Ben Marks, RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) LLP

Contact residential property partner Ben Marks today to enquire about the right to rent checks.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • What is the Employment Rights Bill 2024?
    The Employment Rights Bill 2024 marks a pivotal moment in UK employment law, promising the most significant reforms in over three decades


    Read more
  • Autumn Budget Statement 2024
    Key implications for employment law, property law, and estate planning


    Read more
  • Disclosure against warranties in UK corporate transactions
    In UK corporate transactions, disclosure of information is a vital strategy for sellers to shield themselves from warranty claims when selling their shares or business.


    Read more
  • How the Employment Rights Bill 2024 impacts employers and businesses
    The government’s new Employment Rights Bill outlines significant changes to employment laws, focusing on workers' rights and flexibility.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Autumn/Winter 2024 Edition


    Read more

What they say...

  • Stephen, November 2024
    “Outstanding family lawyer who came through for me in a difficult case. In the world new to me of divorce and the aftermath, [Pippa Marshall] provided excellent advice from the first call and right through to conclusion. She made a difficult ex

  • M. M. Homes, November 2024
    “Charlotte explained everything very clearly and made the whole process nice and easy. Have already started recommending her to my friends.” Wills and LPAs

  • Nim, November 2024
    “I highly recommend James McMullan and his team. They all did a fantastic job with helping me through a particularly difficult family situation. They are extremely professional, caring, and experts in their field.” Probate and contentious

  • Man Kiu Wan, November 2024
    “Thank you Charlotte for your excellent and professional services.” Probate

  • Ms K, November 2024
    “I was recently made redundant, and my company had handled some of the process quite poorly. Patrick came recommended by a friend who had used him during her own redundancy, and I can now wholeheartedly recommend him myself. His initial consult

Read more
Send this to a friend