Skip to main content

News story

May 9, 2022

Ensure equality in residential tenancies

For residential landlords, identity checks on prospective tenants can be challenging and the penalties harsh for getting it wrong; but trying to avoid tenants with complex immigration status is not an option, as this opens the way to claims of unlawful discrimination.

The obligation to conduct so-called ‘right to rent’ checks were first imposed on landlords, or their agents, under the Immigration Act 2014, and later updated in the Immigration Act 2016. The aim was to prevent individuals without lawful immigration status from accessing the private rented sector. The checks apply to all prospective tenants over the age of 18 for a new residential let, whether via a private landlord, lettings agent or an owner-occupier renting to lodgers.

Since the initial checks were set out, the requirements have regularly been updated to reflect changes in the process and digitalisation of services. Most recently a new set of requirements came into force on 6 April 2022, outlining both online and manual right to work checks, depending on the status of the tenant. This includes changes to the way in which the Biometric Residence Card (BRC), Biometric Residence Permit (BRP) and Frontier Worker Permit (FWP) can be used to evidence a holder’s right to rent.

Previously landlords could accept a physical BRP, BRC or FWP as valid proof if it showed an expiry date within the term of the tenancy, but now this must be checked using the Home Office online service. Home Office online checks are also required for individuals who have only digital proof of their immigration status in the UK.

The checks can be extremely complex for some non-UK citizens and a recent House of Commons review of the regulation of private rented housing found 25% of landlords were unwilling to rent to non-British passport holders. But any landlord thinking to avoid their obligations, by deterring prospective foreign tenants or favouring those who are apparently British, could find themselves subject to action under anti-discriminatory measures and the Equality Act 2010.

Landlords who discriminate on the basis of a protected characteristic, such as race or racial grounds, including ‘colour, nationality, and ethnic or national origins’ could find themselves facing a claim for an uncapped level of damages if a prospective tenant with the right to live in the UK is rejected on these grounds. Or if a landlord publishes a discriminatory advertisement or instructs their agent to discriminate, the Equality and Human Rights Commission can bring proceedings.

When faced with all the small print and knowing there are fines or even imprisonment, for incorrectly carrying out right to rent checks, a landlord may think it simpler to look for a tenant who is more easily checked out, but that path is equally risky.

To avoid discrimination, every prospective tenant should be treated exactly the same way, so no one is discouraged or excluded, either directly or indirectly, because of a known or perceived protected characteristic. The right to rent checks should also be undertaken consistently, whether or not a landlord believes someone is a British citizen.

Getting guidance and regular updates on how to manage the checks is ideal, as things can change all the time. As well as the new requirements from 6 April, we recently saw the government release special rules regarding the right to rent checks for Ukrainian nationals escaping the conflict.

It’s also a good idea to adopt the Government checklist and follow the code that is set out, as that will demonstrate best practice and provide a statutory excuse against liability if you are found to have rented to anyone disqualified by reason of immigration status.

Property partner, Ben Marks, RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) LLP

Contact residential property partner Ben Marks today to enquire about the right to rent checks.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • New sexual harassment rules may signal changes to office parties or a decline altogether
    Tomorrow is expected to be one of the busiest nights for office Christmas parties this year. While these celebrations are a staple of the festive season, offering a chance for colleagues to unwind and bond, they also bring unique challenges for emplo


    Read more
  • Employers need to support couples during relationship breakups
    Family Christmases are often followed by the news of unhappy couples calling it quits in January, leading to so-called "Divorce Day", as family lawyers receive numerous enquiries when they reopen after the Christmas break.


    Read more
  • What are trustee responsibilities? A guide to key duties and best practices
    Trustees' responsibilities encompass a wide range of duties when overseeing a trust estate under their care.


    Read more
  • What is the Employment Rights Bill 2024?
    The Employment Rights Bill 2024 marks a pivotal moment in UK employment law, promising the most significant reforms in over three decades


    Read more
  • Autumn Budget Statement 2024
    Key implications for employment law, property law, and estate planning


    Read more

What they say...

  • Howard, December 2024
    “Outstanding service. The process from start to finish was run so smoothly. Very professional and everyone involved was a pleasure to deal with and helped with easy to understand guidance, especially during this difficult time of losing a close

  • Ms McVeigh, December 2024
    Advice on redundancy, exit negotiations and settlement “I would like to express my gratitude to RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) LLP and specifically, Patrick Simpson for handling my case with professionalism whilst being prompt and personable. The pr

  • Rob Henderson, December 2024
    “Thoroughly professional. Way to deal with and access.” Contract review

  • Ms Lind, December 2024
    “I would highly recommend Patrick! Patrick advised me when I was being made redundant, making sure I was aware of my rights and advocated for me in all communications with my company. He came across very professional, trustworthy and knowledgea

  • Pal Peshikaj, December 2024
    “Compare Ben Marks and Martin Alfreds with MJ and Pippen – the conveyancers dream team. Both Ben and Martin were amazing in assisting us with the completion of our first purchase. Martin was always accessible, understanding and prompt whe

Read more
Send this to a friend