Skip to main content

News story

March 22, 2016

RICS arbitration service launched

RICS arbitration service for construction and engineering disputes

The obligation placed on parties to consider alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms is well documented. It’s one of the subjects of our ever-evolving laws. Parties to a dispute (and their lawyers) must actively consider ADR.

ADR ranges from non-binding processes, such as without prejudice roundtable meetings to mediation, to binding processes, such as expert determinations and arbitration. Resorting to the courts is often called “the last tool in the toolbox”.

It is normally prudent for the parties to explore non-binding forms of ADR first as often this is the most cost-effective way to resolve a dispute. Where that is not appropriate, or it has failed, parties should go on to consider binding ADR processes ranging from expert determinations to arbitration.

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) has launched a new arbitration service specifically for construction and engineering disputes.

The RICS arbitration service offers:

  • Fast track arbitration services for disputes under £100,000. The fast track caps a party’s recoverable costs, limits the amount arbitrators can charge and requires the publication of arbitration awards every six months.
  • A select arbitration service intended to provide a “viable alternative” to the Technology and Construction Court for high-value complex disputes publishing awards within 12 months.

The advantage of the RICS arbitration service is that it can achieve a more comprehensive deliberation of the issues rather than the current adjudication process (which can often be cursory in approach). Currently, only the fast track arbitration service rules are available on the website; RICS plan further development in time.

This RICS arbitration service illustrates the ever-evolving methods of ADR promoted by various professions.

Practitioners who do not advise their clients of all of the alternatives available to them could find themselves facing questions, complaints and possible claims from their clients if they have not advised them of cheaper and quicker alternatives to the Court process.

Contact property litigator Laura St-Gallay for more information about the RICS arbitration service.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more

What they say...

  • Anon, April 2025
    “Whistleblowing dismissal claim and settlement negotiations I can not speak highly enough of this firm and [Patrick Simpson], they were not only understanding of my case needs they also worked with the up most integrity and professionalism to e

  • Patrick, April 2025
    “We had a long process handled by Charlotte & James from RIAA Barker Gillette. Even though we were outside the UK Charlotte & James we’re always available and we developed a great working relationship with them.They gave sound advice,

  • Leann Paris, March 2025
    “From the beginning to the end, the support we have received throughout the case with all the staff members has been far more than we expected, we got kept up to date with every single matter, I have had stressful few years but Charlotte and he

  • C Smith, March 2025
    “As executor of a will it was a relief for a solicitor to act on my behalf as though no disputes it was still a lengthy and complex process. It was dealt with mostly by Charlotte B. who kept me informed at all times. She explained the process c

  • Marc, March 2025
    “RIAA Barker Gillette were engaged to handle a real estate transaction with unusual circumstances. As a non-UK resident unfamiliar with English conveyancing procedures, I felt completely satisfied with the depth of the information and explanati

Read more
Send this to a friend