Skip to main content

News story

January 7, 2025

RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) acts for Alexander Nix in Commercial Litigation

Press Release

Alexander Nix was the former CEO of Cambridge Analytica.

Judgment was handed down on 6 December 2024 in the high-profile case of Dynamo Recoveries Ltd & Emerdata Ltd v Alexander Nix, following a two-week trial in October 2024 before Dame Clare Moulder DBE.

The claims by Dynamo Recoveries and Emerdata, as well as a cross-claim by Mr Nix heard at the same trial, arose after the failure of the Cambridge Analytica business in 2018. Cambridge Analytica was a data and political advertising business that became prominent after its involvement in the successful 2016 Donald Trump presidential campaign. In 2018, it collapsed into insolvency following extensive and sustained critical media coverage. The claimants had sought compensation from Mr Nix relating to the business’s failure based on alleged breaches of fiduciary and statutory duties and misrepresentations.

During closing submissions, the claimants abandoned all their claims and defences based on alleged fraudulent misrepresentations. The court rejected all the remaining claims for damages against Mr Nix, valued at over £50 million. In addition, Mr Nix’s claims against Emerdata for $12 million of outstanding debts succeeded in full.

RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) ‘s legal team, led by partner Vinay Verma and assisted by Associate Daniel Downes, provided practical and strategic representation for Mr Nix since the dispute first arose in 2018. Jonathan Allcock of Maitland Chambers acted as sole counsel for Mr Nix.

A copy of the Dynamo Recoveries Ltd & Emerdata Ltd v Alexander Nix judgment is available here.

Please contact partner Vinay Verma at RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) for more information.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more

What they say...

  • Anon, April 2025
    “Whistleblowing dismissal claim and settlement negotiations I can not speak highly enough of this firm and [Patrick Simpson], they were not only understanding of my case needs they also worked with the up most integrity and professionalism to e

  • Patrick, April 2025
    “We had a long process handled by Charlotte & James from RIAA Barker Gillette. Even though we were outside the UK Charlotte & James we’re always available and we developed a great working relationship with them.They gave sound advice,

  • Leann Paris, March 2025
    “From the beginning to the end, the support we have received throughout the case with all the staff members has been far more than we expected, we got kept up to date with every single matter, I have had stressful few years but Charlotte and he

  • C Smith, March 2025
    “As executor of a will it was a relief for a solicitor to act on my behalf as though no disputes it was still a lengthy and complex process. It was dealt with mostly by Charlotte B. who kept me informed at all times. She explained the process c

  • Marc, March 2025
    “RIAA Barker Gillette were engaged to handle a real estate transaction with unusual circumstances. As a non-UK resident unfamiliar with English conveyancing procedures, I felt completely satisfied with the depth of the information and explanati

Read more