Skip to main content

Insight article

September 30, 2024

Personal liability pitfalls for directors

Directors can face personal liability for torts committed by their company, as a recent Supreme Court ruling reveals. Learn more about the risks and how to protect yourself.

personal liability for directors. A director ticking a safeguarding shield

A recent Supreme Court judgment in Lifestyle Equities CV and another v Ahmed and another serves as a critical reminder that company directors are not insulated from personal liability for torts (wrongs) committed by their companies.

Directors can be held personally accountable, even when acting in their official capacity, a fact that underlines the serious risks involved in their role. While some points raised by the court were obiter (non-binding), the case sheds light on several key legal pitfalls that directors must be mindful of to avoid personal exposure.

What is tort law?

Tort law governs civil lawsuits that arise outside of contractual disputes. Its primary purpose is to address harm caused by wrongful actions, offering relief to the injured party, usually in the form of monetary compensation. For directors, tort law represents a potential personal liability that can have serious financial and reputational consequences.

Key pitfalls and risks for directors

The ruling highlighted several crucial points that directors need to consider:

1. Personal liability when acting for a company

Directors may mistakenly believe that their position within a company shields them from personal liability. However, the Supreme Court rejected the idea that acting in good faith to promote the company’s success (as required by section 172(1) of the Companies Act 2006) is necessarily sufficient to protect them from liability for torts.

In delivering the judgment, Lord Leggatt made it clear that “the fact a company is regarded as a separate person does not… justify treating a director whose act is attributed to the company as free from personal liability for that act.” In other words, directors cannot hide behind the corporate veil; they can be held personally responsible for wrongful acts committed by the company under their direction.

2. Directors as accessories to corporate wrongs

Another pitfall involves being held liable as an accessory to a tort committed by the company. The court ruled that directors can be personally liable if they have specific knowledge of the wrongful act, even if they are not directly responsible for it. In cases of strict liability torts (where knowledge of wrongdoing is not required for the primary tortfeasor), a director could still be held accountable if it can be shown that they were aware of the tort being committed. Acting without knowledge or in good faith may provide some protection, but directors cannot rely on this alone.

3. Directors’ salaries could be at risk

In addressing how profits should be accounted for where the company has been guilty of a tort, the court provided some clarification but also a potential area of vulnerability for directors: the court determined that while only the profits of the primary tortfeasor (the person committing the tort) should be accounted for, a director’s salary could be considered profit if it can be shown that the salary is directly tied to the tort.

Although this is difficult to prove, the ruling sends a strong message: under the right circumstances, directors could be forced to account for part of their salary if it results from wrongful acts. This risk underscores the need for directors to exercise caution in their decision-making to avoid personal financial exposure.

Personal liability lessons for directors

Directors should not assume they are protected simply because they act in good faith or within their corporate duties. The Supreme Court has made it clear that directors can be held personally liable for torts committed by the companies they represent. Failure to act prudently or ignorance of wrongful acts could expose them to significant legal and financial consequences.

To minimise these risks, directors should:

  • Immediately cease any conduct that could constitute a tort as soon as they become aware of it.
  • Seek legal advice whenever there is uncertainty about whether their actions may lead to liability.
  • Closely monitor company activities, ensuring that any questionable actions are addressed swiftly and effectively to prevent liability.

This judgment highlights the complex responsibilities directors face in their roles. Directors must be proactive in seeking expert legal advice to fully understand their liabilities and to avoid personal exposure to tort claims. Having a clear understanding of the law will help directors navigate their duties more confidently and mitigate risks.

If you are a director and would like advice about your personal liability, contact our corporate and commercial team at RIAA Barker Gillette for expert legal guidance tailored to safeguard you and your business from potential tort-related risks.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more
  • Navigating the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023: What it means for your business
    The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (the Act) represents a significant shift in the UK's approach to combating economic crime, improving corporate transparency, and anti-mo


    Read more
  • Blowing kisses, not boundaries
    Tribunal clears air on workplace etiquette.


    Read more
  • Estate planning: How not to make mincemeat of it!
    The High Court has confirmed that a will handwritten on the back of two cardboard food packages is legally binding.


    Read more

What they say...

  • C Smith, March 2025
    “As executor of a will it was a relief for a solicitor to act on my behalf as though no disputes it was still a lengthy and complex process. It was dealt with mostly by Charlotte B. who kept me informed at all times. She explained the process c

  • Marc, March 2025
    “RIAA Barker Gillette were engaged to handle a real estate transaction with unusual circumstances. As a non-UK resident unfamiliar with English conveyancing procedures, I felt completely satisfied with the depth of the information and explanati

  • Leigh, March 2025
    “Instructed Martin on my first property purchase. He was a delight to work with, kept me informed and updated regularly. It was an incredibly smooth and quick process. Couldn’t be happier.”

  • Ms Brownell, March 2025
    “Patrick was amazing from start to finish. He made the process so easy, and explained each step in detail ahead of time so I’d understand what would happen and when. He was incredibly organized and noted every detail, calling out things t

  • Roman Cassini, February 2025
    “Peter Wright – highly recommended solicitor, helped us though a complicated flat sale with consummate professionalism.”

Read more
Send this to a friend