Skip to main content

News story

February 22, 2018

The New Electronic Communications Code: Key points for landowners

A new Electronic Communications Code came into force on 28 December 2017, the rationale behind which is the improvement of telecoms operators’ networks, infrastructure and connectivity.

The new Electronic Communications Code grants certain rights to operators (“Code Rights”), including installing, maintaining, upgrading and operating apparatus and connecting to a power supply. These rights can be acquired either by entering into an agreement with a landowner/occupier or by an agreement imposed by a Court order.

Written agreement

An agreement needn’t be in the form of a lease, and whilst Ofcom is obliged to produce standard terms, it is optional whether to adopt these. It is also worth noting the following:

  • other than requiring an assignor to guarantee an assignee’s obligations, restrictions on assignment are void. Landowners therefore have no control over the assignment of such agreements, which is a concern;
  • leases containing Code Rights now fall outside of the ambit of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954;
  • terms which seek to exclude or are contrary to the Code are not enforceable; and
  • an agreement entered into by an occupier will not necessarily bind the freeholder.

Agreement by Court order

In such an agreement, the consideration is based on a “no scheme” market value which ignores the site’s value to the operator and, arguably, could result in a lower rent. It is also worth noting that a Court cannot make an order if there is an intention to redevelop, which could not reasonably be carried out if the order were made.

Other matters of note

Code Rights include sharing apparatus with other operators provided they comply with certain criteria. Terms which seek to restrict this (including requiring consent) are void. Landowners, therefore, may be unable to gain extra income from entering into additional agreements with further operators.

Any existing agreements granted subject to the previous 1984 Code are subject to transitional provisions, so the new Code will apply to them but with modifications.

Also, note that Code Rights needn’t be registered at the Land Registry to be binding.

Termination

To remove Code Rights, a site provider must serve a minimum of 18 months’ notice from the expiry date of a Code agreement specifying a relevant ground, which includes an intention to redevelop all or part of the land or neighbouring land and which could not reasonably be done unless the Code agreement ends. If the operator objects, it can serve a counter notice within three months and apply for a Court order. The Court will then determine the matter. There is a separate procedure to remove apparatus, and different rules will apply depending on the circumstances.

The extra income to be gained by landowners from allowing telecom operators to utilise roofspace is obviously welcome. However, if there is any scope for future development, careful consideration is required as to whether the additional income is worth the potential difficulties further down the line in securing vacant possession.

Call property partner John Gillette today for more information on Code Rights and the electronic communications code.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more

What they say...

  • Anon, April 2025
    “Whistleblowing dismissal claim and settlement negotiations I can not speak highly enough of this firm and [Patrick Simpson], they were not only understanding of my case needs they also worked with the up most integrity and professionalism to e

  • Patrick, April 2025
    “We had a long process handled by Charlotte & James from RIAA Barker Gillette. Even though we were outside the UK Charlotte & James we’re always available and we developed a great working relationship with them.They gave sound advice,

  • Leann Paris, March 2025
    “From the beginning to the end, the support we have received throughout the case with all the staff members has been far more than we expected, we got kept up to date with every single matter, I have had stressful few years but Charlotte and he

  • C Smith, March 2025
    “As executor of a will it was a relief for a solicitor to act on my behalf as though no disputes it was still a lengthy and complex process. It was dealt with mostly by Charlotte B. who kept me informed at all times. She explained the process c

  • Marc, March 2025
    “RIAA Barker Gillette were engaged to handle a real estate transaction with unusual circumstances. As a non-UK resident unfamiliar with English conveyancing procedures, I felt completely satisfied with the depth of the information and explanati

Read more
Send this to a friend