Skip to main content

Insight article

June 28, 2019

Can I fire someone with less than two years of service?

Generally, employees can only claim unfair dismissal against an employer if they have a minimum of two years’ service.

This is not, however, a green light to dismiss someone with less than two years’ service, as there are other employment law issues to consider. However, as an employer, it gives you some flexibility in managing and dismissing staff with less than two years of service under their belt.

When a new employee starts, keep an eye out for any concerns you might have and note their start date. If dissatisfied, it’s easier to dismiss someone in their first two years of employment, subject to some of the caveats below.

Know the risks

In some cases, there is no qualifying period of employment (i.e. length of service), for example, the ‘automatically unfair’ reasons for dismissal. If you’ve not heard of these before, read our article “What are the automatically unfair reasons for dismissal?”. Another area is discrimination. Employment law recognises nine types of discrimination:

  • age
  • disability
  • gender reassignment
  • marriage and civil partnership
  • pregnancy and maternity
  • race
  • religion or belief
  • sex
  • sexual orientation

Before dismissing an employee with less than two years of service, you should check that there is no discriminatory aspect to the decision.

You should also be aware that there is only a one-month qualifying period for an employee who is dismissed in circumstances where they should have been suspended on medical grounds.

Further, it is important to check whether any company policies or procedures are contractually binding. If so, you must ensure capability and disciplinary procedures are followed.

Ideally a company’s policies and procedures should not form part of an employment contract, as this enables change without consultation.”

Irrespective of unfair dismissal claims, employees can claim wrongful dismissal for breach of contract if an employer does not provide the correct notice period or does not make a payment in lieu of notice. If this is the case, fairness is not even an issue. The sole question to be answered is whether the contract has been breached.

Lastly, don’t forget employees are entitled to be paid for any accrued holiday not taken at the termination date.

What to do – as a minimum!

Meet with the employee in question and outline any concerns you may have. Take notes at that meeting. Notes are important because they record what was discussed and are useful if issues arise further down the line. You may give the employee a short period to improve, for instance, if the issue is performance related. If you remain unhappy after this period, the option to dismiss can be pursued quickly and efficiently.

Dismissals close to two years of service

Employers should always seek legal advice when considering dismissing an employee with close to two years of service. It is important to bear in mind statutory and contractual notice periods even when you’re dismissing without paying notice.

“An employee whose termination date is the day before the second anniversary of their start date, will have two years of service and qualify for an unfair dismissal claim.”

Best practice

Employers should follow the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedure. If the employer has unreasonably failed to follow the code, they risk facing a 25% uplift on any compensation. Therefore, a dismissal without notice may be met with an unlawful deduction from wages claim or breach of contract, along with an uplift, and a capability termination may be met with a discrimination claim, also with the risk of an uplift.

Employers following the code add robustness to any claim on an evidential basis.

If you’re unsure of how to get rid of an employee, speak to Karen Cole today.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more

What they say...

  • Anon, April 2025
    “Whistleblowing dismissal claim and settlement negotiations I can not speak highly enough of this firm and [Patrick Simpson], they were not only understanding of my case needs they also worked with the up most integrity and professionalism to e

  • Patrick, April 2025
    “We had a long process handled by Charlotte & James from RIAA Barker Gillette. Even though we were outside the UK Charlotte & James we’re always available and we developed a great working relationship with them.They gave sound advice,

  • Leann Paris, March 2025
    “From the beginning to the end, the support we have received throughout the case with all the staff members has been far more than we expected, we got kept up to date with every single matter, I have had stressful few years but Charlotte and he

  • C Smith, March 2025
    “As executor of a will it was a relief for a solicitor to act on my behalf as though no disputes it was still a lengthy and complex process. It was dealt with mostly by Charlotte B. who kept me informed at all times. She explained the process c

  • Marc, March 2025
    “RIAA Barker Gillette were engaged to handle a real estate transaction with unusual circumstances. As a non-UK resident unfamiliar with English conveyancing procedures, I felt completely satisfied with the depth of the information and explanati

Read more
Send this to a friend