Skip to main content

Insight article

June 15, 2017

Hope for the best, prepare for the worst

While pre-nuptial agreements are becoming more and more popular, many still see them as cynical and unromantic. After all, why would you want to marry someone if you thought you might break up with them? However, it may be worth thinking of a pre-nuptial agreement as an “insurance policy” rather than a “break-up agreement”.

While pre-nuptial agreements are becoming more and more popular, many still see them as cynical and unromantic. After all, why would you want to marry someone if you thought you might break up with them? However, it may be worth thinking of a pre-nuptial agreement as an “insurance policy” rather than a “break-up agreement”.

What do they do?

Ensure Stability

  • The fact is that people are getting married at a later stage in their life. By this time, they are financially stable and will have a few assets under their name – the flat they saved up for, the property they inherited or the shares that have been slowly gaining value since the recession. It makes sense to put in place an “insurance policy” to protect your assets.
  • It is not just the financially stable that benefit from entering such an “insurance policy”. The agreement may contain provisions in which the weaker party (financially speaking) is entitled to a lump sum, a right of residency or even maintenance for a specific period following the break-up of the relationship.

Give weight to your agreement

Although pre-nuptial agreements are not legally binding, in 2010, the Supreme Court set out a test (Radmacher v Granatino) that Courts should follow to determine how much weight should be given to such an agreement.

  • Firstly, the Court must ensure that the parties were open and honest in disclosing all their pre-marital assets and debts – if you fail to mention a pre-marital asset that is later discovered, nothing gets protected.
  • Secondly, the Court will check that both parties knew what they were signing – both parties will need to seek and obtain independent legal advice.
  • Thirdly, the Court will check that one party did not coerce the other party into signing the agreement – so you cannot surprise your partner with a pre-nuptial agreement at the altar. It is preferable that an agreement is signed at least one month before the wedding.
  • Finally, the agreement cannot prejudice either party’s position as of the date of the divorce. Generally, the longer the marriage lasts, the less weight the pre-nuptial agreement will carry in the eyes of the court. This is because the parties may have gained, lost or even merged their debts and assets. Furthermore, healthcare needs may have changed, or there may be a child to take into consideration as at the date of the divorce.

In 2010, the Office for National Statistics revealed that 42% of marriages in England and Wales ended in divorce. Can you guarantee that you’ll make the 58% that doesn’t?

Even if you have been married for some time it may be worth reviewing and updating your agreement if you have already made one. However, if you have not yet made one you may want to consider entering a post nuptial agreement.

Contact Pippa Marshall today for more advice and information.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more
  • Navigating the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023: What it means for your business
    The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (the Act) represents a significant shift in the UK's approach to combating economic crime, improving corporate transparency, and anti-mo


    Read more

What they say...

  • Anon, April 2025
    “Whistleblowing dismissal claim and settlement negotiations I can not speak highly enough of this firm and [Patrick Simpson], they were not only understanding of my case needs they also worked with the up most integrity and professionalism to e

  • Patrick, April 2025
    “We had a long process handled by Charlotte & James from RIAA Barker Gillette. Even though we were outside the UK Charlotte & James we’re always available and we developed a great working relationship with them.They gave sound advice,

  • Leann Paris, March 2025
    “From the beginning to the end, the support we have received throughout the case with all the staff members has been far more than we expected, we got kept up to date with every single matter, I have had stressful few years but Charlotte and he

  • C Smith, March 2025
    “As executor of a will it was a relief for a solicitor to act on my behalf as though no disputes it was still a lengthy and complex process. It was dealt with mostly by Charlotte B. who kept me informed at all times. She explained the process c

  • Marc, March 2025
    “RIAA Barker Gillette were engaged to handle a real estate transaction with unusual circumstances. As a non-UK resident unfamiliar with English conveyancing procedures, I felt completely satisfied with the depth of the information and explanati

Read more
Send this to a friend