Skip to main content

Insight article

June 15, 2017

Hope for the best, prepare for the worst

While pre-nuptial agreements are becoming more and more popular, many still see them as cynical and unromantic. After all, why would you want to marry someone if you thought you might break up with them? However, it may be worth thinking of a pre-nuptial agreement as an “insurance policy” rather than a “break-up agreement”.

While pre-nuptial agreements are becoming more and more popular, many still see them as cynical and unromantic. After all, why would you want to marry someone if you thought you might break up with them? However, it may be worth thinking of a pre-nuptial agreement as an “insurance policy” rather than a “break-up agreement”.

What do they do?

Ensure Stability

  • The fact is that people are getting married at a later stage in their life. By this time, they are financially stable and will have a few assets under their name – the flat they saved up for, the property they inherited or the shares that have been slowly gaining value since the recession. It makes sense to put in place an “insurance policy” to protect your assets.
  • It is not just the financially stable that benefit from entering such an “insurance policy”. The agreement may contain provisions in which the weaker party (financially speaking) is entitled to a lump sum, a right of residency or even maintenance for a specific period following the break-up of the relationship.

Give weight to your agreement

Although pre-nuptial agreements are not legally binding, in 2010, the Supreme Court set out a test (Radmacher v Granatino) that Courts should follow to determine how much weight should be given to such an agreement.

  • Firstly, the Court must ensure that the parties were open and honest in disclosing all their pre-marital assets and debts – if you fail to mention a pre-marital asset that is later discovered, nothing gets protected.
  • Secondly, the Court will check that both parties knew what they were signing – both parties will need to seek and obtain independent legal advice.
  • Thirdly, the Court will check that one party did not coerce the other party into signing the agreement – so you cannot surprise your partner with a pre-nuptial agreement at the altar. It is preferable that an agreement is signed at least one month before the wedding.
  • Finally, the agreement cannot prejudice either party’s position as of the date of the divorce. Generally, the longer the marriage lasts, the less weight the pre-nuptial agreement will carry in the eyes of the court. This is because the parties may have gained, lost or even merged their debts and assets. Furthermore, healthcare needs may have changed, or there may be a child to take into consideration as at the date of the divorce.

In 2010, the Office for National Statistics revealed that 42% of marriages in England and Wales ended in divorce. Can you guarantee that you’ll make the 58% that doesn’t?

Even if you have been married for some time it may be worth reviewing and updating your agreement if you have already made one. However, if you have not yet made one you may want to consider entering a post nuptial agreement.

Contact Pippa Marshall today for more advice and information.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • When charity shouldn’t begin at home
    The downfall of the Captain Tom Foundation is a cautionary tale of what happens when a charity gets too close to home — highlighting the complexities of charity governance and accountability in the sector. The foundation, created to continue the fu


    Read more
  • Six tips to make things simple for your executors
    An executor is legally responsible for carrying out the instructions set out in a will.


    Read more
  • Staying ahead in a changing legal landscape
    Regularly reviewing employment contracts and policies is essential for legal compliance and risk mitigation. Stay updated on legislative changes, workplace trends, and best practices to protect your business and employees.


    Read more
  • RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) acts for Alexander Nix in Commercial Litigation
    Press Release


    Read more
  • New sexual harassment rules may signal changes to office parties or a decline altogether
    Tomorrow is expected to be one of the busiest nights for office Christmas parties this year. While these celebrations are a staple of the festive season, offering a chance for colleagues to unwind and bond, they also bring unique challenges for emplo


    Read more

What they say...

  • Mikaela, February 2025
    “Martin was brilliant – so professional and personable. He clearly has a lot of expertise, and we always felt were in safe hands. He’s always available to speak on the phone, and is incredibly patient and reassuring. He worked effic

  • Bibiana Farenzena, February 2025
    “Victoria Holland and Evangelos Kyveris I want to thank you for your involvement and efforts on this case. You have been immensely helpful, and I appreciate all your knowledge and advice regarding this matter.”

  • Dabid Shaw, February 2025
    “Excellent , personalised one to one client care. Options laid out in a comprehensible manner. Fees appropriate for service provided.” Herman Cheung

  • Michael, February 2025
    “Martin was great to work with, despite a very difficult first buyer, second time round was the charm! Thanks to Sharon too.”

  • Annette, February 2025
    “We contacted RIAA Barker Gillette to get our wills arranged. Herman was professional & helpful with all aspects of the process. He explained everything clearly, notified in writing everything we discussed & answered the many questions

Read more
Send this to a friend