Skip to main content

News story

May 17, 2018

Firefighter ruling sparks new heat for employers

The standby arrangements for Belgium’s volunteer firefighters are set to cause new headaches across the European Union for employers with workers who are paid flat rates for time on-call or when sleeping in the workplace

In February, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that volunteer firefighter Rudy Matzak was a ‘worker’ and that within the meaning of the Working Time Directive, his time on standby was ‘working’ time.

Under that Directive, ‘working time’ refers to “any period during which the worker is working, at the employer’s disposal and carrying out his activity or duties, in accordance with national laws and/or practice”. It applies to all sectors, including both public and private, and ‘rest period’ refers to any period not classed as working time.

When he was on call, Mr Matzak had to be at home and able to fulfil the requirement of an eight-minute response time to reach the fire station. The Court said that this obligation to remain “physically present at the place determined by the employer and the … constraints resulting from the need to reach his place of work within eight minutes” meant that he was limited in how he could pursue his personal and social life. This contrasted with a worker who may be asked simply to be contactable.

The knock-on effect for employers of standby time being deemed to be working time is that it must be taken into account when complying with rest periods, working hours and the National Minimum Wage.

The judgment follows hard on the heels of last year’s hearing by the Employment Appeal Tribunal of three cases:

  1. Focus Care Agency Ltd v Roberts
  2. Frudd v The Partington Group Ltd
  3. Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake

The Employment Appeal Tribunal said that businesses must conduct a ‘multifactorial evaluation’ as there is no clear, hard and fast way to distinguish between on-call workers who are considered to be ‘at work’ and those who are not. The factors highlighted as likely to be a ‘working’ situation included whether an employee was on site to comply with a regulatory or contractual obligation, whether they would be disciplined for failing to remain on standby if they had to keep a listening ear and respond and the extent to which they had to initiate action.

Employment lawyer, Karen Cole, said:

“Whether or not a worker on standby is ‘working’ will depend on the circumstances of each case, but the fact that the issue is complicated with grey areas does not mean that businesses can ignore it. Back-pay for up to six years could be due and that could mean substantial sums for businesses to find.

For any situation that seems unclear, it’s worth seeking independent advice. An easily made change to the way that on-call systems are operated might clarify things and take an employee out of a potential ‘working’ situation.”

The National Minimum Wage Regulations will apply when the on-call claim is found to be ‘working’ time. The Regulations apply to any eligible workers, whether or not they are paid by the hour. Calculations must be made according to the payment basis to check if the equivalent hourly rate is at the right amount.

2018’s National Living Wage and the National Minimum Wage are:

YearApril 2018
25 and over£7.83
21 to 24£7.38
18 to 20£5.90
Under 18£4.20
Apprentice£3.70

For more information on ‘working’, speak to Karen Cole today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more
  • Navigating the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023: What it means for your business
    The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (the Act) represents a significant shift in the UK's approach to combating economic crime, improving corporate transparency, and anti-mo


    Read more
  • Blowing kisses, not boundaries
    Tribunal clears air on workplace etiquette.


    Read more
  • Estate planning: How not to make mincemeat of it!
    The High Court has confirmed that a will handwritten on the back of two cardboard food packages is legally binding.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Leann Paris, March 2025
    “From the beginning to the end, the support we have received throughout the case with all the staff members has been far more than we expected, we got kept up to date with every single matter, I have had stressful few years but Charlotte and he

  • C Smith, March 2025
    “As executor of a will it was a relief for a solicitor to act on my behalf as though no disputes it was still a lengthy and complex process. It was dealt with mostly by Charlotte B. who kept me informed at all times. She explained the process c

  • Marc, March 2025
    “RIAA Barker Gillette were engaged to handle a real estate transaction with unusual circumstances. As a non-UK resident unfamiliar with English conveyancing procedures, I felt completely satisfied with the depth of the information and explanati

  • Leigh, March 2025
    “Instructed Martin on my first property purchase. He was a delight to work with, kept me informed and updated regularly. It was an incredibly smooth and quick process. Couldn’t be happier.”

  • Ms Brownell, March 2025
    “Patrick was amazing from start to finish. He made the process so easy, and explained each step in detail ahead of time so I’d understand what would happen and when. He was incredibly organized and noted every detail, calling out things t

Read more