Skip to main content

Insight article

December 2, 2022

Divorce applications at ten-year high

On 6 April 2022, the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act (2020) came into force - a landmark reform introducing ‘no-fault divorce’ for couples ending their marriage.

As a result of the new legislation, statistics released by the Ministry of Justice show divorce applications from April to June of this year were at a ten-year high, up 22% from the same quarter in 2021. So, why were so many couples holding out to file for divorce until after 6 April?

What is a no-fault divorce?

No-fault divorce allows couples to divorce without attributing blame to any one party. It intends to make the process less acrimonious and enable people to focus on other practical and emotional aspects of their separation, including reducing conflict for children.

How does no-fault divorce make the process easier?

The Act brought several long-awaited changes that made it easier for couples to end their marriage or civil partnership. It might explain the recent spike in divorce applications since the new rules came into force.

Grounds for divorce

Previously, divorcing couples had to show that their marriage had irretrievably broken down by establishing one of the ‘five grounds’ of divorce. These were adultery, unreasonable behaviour, desertion, living apart for at least two years with consent and living apart for at least five years without consent.

As the concept of fault has been removed from divorce proceedings, there is no longer a requirement to demonstrate the irretrievable breakdown of a marriage. Couples no longer have to cite one of the five grounds for divorce.

Divorce applications can no longer be contested

Under the old rules, one party could contest the divorce if they did not agree with the grounds. This could either delay or potentially prevent the divorce from being successful – thus forcing one party to stay married to the other against their wishes.

One of the most significant changes under the Act is that respondents can no longer contest divorce petitions except for reasons of jurisdiction.

Joint divorce applications

Under the Act, one single party is no longer required to initiate divorce proceedings. Instead, a couple can now make a joint application.

Updated terminology in the divorce process

The terms and wording previously used during the divorce process have been modernised. For example, the person applying for the divorce is now called the applicant rather than the petitioner. In addition, the decree nisi is now a conditional order, and the decree absolute is called the final order.

Despite these reforms, obtaining professional legal advice from a family lawyer (preferably a Resolution member) is essential. A solicitor will ensure that items, such as the financial settlement, are dealt with properly at the time of divorce.

Speak to family solicitor Pippa Marshall today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more

What they say...

  • Anon, April 2025
    “Whistleblowing dismissal claim and settlement negotiations I can not speak highly enough of this firm and [Patrick Simpson], they were not only understanding of my case needs they also worked with the up most integrity and professionalism to e

  • Patrick, April 2025
    “We had a long process handled by Charlotte & James from RIAA Barker Gillette. Even though we were outside the UK Charlotte & James we’re always available and we developed a great working relationship with them.They gave sound advice,

  • Leann Paris, March 2025
    “From the beginning to the end, the support we have received throughout the case with all the staff members has been far more than we expected, we got kept up to date with every single matter, I have had stressful few years but Charlotte and he

  • C Smith, March 2025
    “As executor of a will it was a relief for a solicitor to act on my behalf as though no disputes it was still a lengthy and complex process. It was dealt with mostly by Charlotte B. who kept me informed at all times. She explained the process c

  • Marc, March 2025
    “RIAA Barker Gillette were engaged to handle a real estate transaction with unusual circumstances. As a non-UK resident unfamiliar with English conveyancing procedures, I felt completely satisfied with the depth of the information and explanati

Read more
Send this to a friend