Skip to main content

Insight article

December 1, 2023

Director responsibilities on resignation – do you know yours?

When Rishi Sunak removed Suella Braverman from her cabinet post, she took a defiant stance, with an open letter criticising the PM for reneging on promises and calling for a leadership election.

Picture of a mail black company director wearing a blue suit, white shirt, light tie and glasses.

It was a defiant, headline-grabbing move that may inspire other discontents looking to speak out against their bosses. But the path for a dissatisfied cabinet minister may not translate into the corporate world so easily.

While resignation may mean general duties no longer bind a company director, their corporate responsibility can continue long after stepping down from the board. 

Under the Insolvency Act 1986, if a director has allowed a company to continue trading when there is no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvency, they could be personally liable, even after resigning. 

Similarly, a director who has acted negligently, fraudulently, or in breach of their duties during their time may be held personally liable for any losses later incurred by the company.  

Neither will resignation be any protection if a conflict of interest arises through the use of any property, information or opportunity gained during a time as director. And if a director has made personal guarantees to secure company loans or debts. In that case, these remain binding, regardless of whether they have resigned. 

Importantly, directors looking to resign must ensure that the company’s finances and other corporate responsibilities are well managed to minimise any risk of personal liability later on. Compliance with the Companies Act 2006 requires directors to exercise reasonable care.

Partner and head of our company and commercial team, Victoria Holland, said:

“Even where a director leaves the business in a position of financial stability, if the company were later to become insolvent, then any director who served during the three years running up to the insolvency could be subject to investigation.

“The impact of this could be far-reaching. For example, where a director has played a role in the company’s difficulties in those three years, they could be disqualified from being a director for up to fifteen years, which could prevent them from continuing in any subsequent role as a director.” 

Partner and head of our employment team, Karen Cole, added:

“For an MP, the resignation or dismissal may be very high profile, but it’s effectively a clean break. For a director, it’s important to be sure that any resignation takes account of the whole picture and they ensure that financial management and other corporate responsibilities are all in good order before they sign the exit paperwork, if they want to minimise any future risk of personal liability.”

For employment advice and corporate queries, contact Karen Cole or Victoria Holland today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Family mediation and child arrangements
    What to do when you separate and there is no agreement in place for the children?


    Read more
  • Fair tips for all: New legislation ensures transparency in gratuity distribution.
    New rules to ensure fairness and transparency around handling tips, gratuities, and service charges for hospitality and other service sector businesses come into force on 1 July 2024. The new rules are designed to create an even-handed approach in si


    Read more
  • Is your business acquisition ready?
    Is your business ready for an acquisition? Learn key considerations from corporate lawyer Evangelos Kyveris at RIAA Barker Gillette, including growth strategy alignment, financial readiness, logistical preparation, and professional assistance for a s


    Read more
  • Preventing sexual harassment
    Employers are facing a pivotal moment as they brace for new regulations regarding sexual harassment set to take effect in October 2024.


    Read more
  • Why employers need a reflective response to employee beliefs
    Recent tribunal judgments on the freedom to express gender-critical views highlight the growing challenge for employers in safely navigating discrimination in the workplace in the face of increasingly complex social attitudes.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Georgina, July 2024
    “We used Peter Wright to act as a conveyancing solicitor in a recent house purchase. We found him approachable, affordable, would return calls, give any necessary advice without being intrusive, and was very thorough in all investigations on th

  • Oggy, July 2024
    “An excellent, professional and importantly, symapthetic service imparted to me from Karen at a most stressful time.” Employment

  • Sarah and Luke Oubridge, July 2024
    “We could not be more happy with the service provided by Herman and his team. From start to finish, we felt listened to, understood and also shared a laugh. Huge thanks.” Wills, tax and trusts

  • Tim Blunn, June 2024
    “My Solicitor (Patrick Simpson) was easy to speak to and very informative throughout my case. I would 100% recommend RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) LLP for employment related issues.”

  • Sabrina, June 2024
    “…mentioned a few complex areas and I appreciated the honesty and clear guidance provided. I would recommend [Pippa Marshall] highly.” Family law – prenup advice

Read more
Send this to a friend