Skip to main content

Insight article

December 1, 2023

Director responsibilities on resignation – do you know yours?

When Rishi Sunak removed Suella Braverman from her cabinet post, she took a defiant stance, with an open letter criticising the PM for reneging on promises and calling for a leadership election.

Picture of a mail black company director wearing a blue suit, white shirt, light tie and glasses.

It was a defiant, headline-grabbing move that may inspire other discontents looking to speak out against their bosses. But the path for a dissatisfied cabinet minister may not translate into the corporate world so easily.

While resignation may mean general duties no longer bind a company director, their corporate responsibility can continue long after stepping down from the board. 

Under the Insolvency Act 1986, if a director has allowed a company to continue trading when there is no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvency, they could be personally liable, even after resigning. 

Similarly, a director who has acted negligently, fraudulently, or in breach of their duties during their time may be held personally liable for any losses later incurred by the company.  

Neither will resignation be any protection if a conflict of interest arises through the use of any property, information or opportunity gained during a time as director. And if a director has made personal guarantees to secure company loans or debts. In that case, these remain binding, regardless of whether they have resigned. 

Importantly, directors looking to resign must ensure that the company’s finances and other corporate responsibilities are well managed to minimise any risk of personal liability later on. Compliance with the Companies Act 2006 requires directors to exercise reasonable care.

Partner and head of our company and commercial team, Victoria Holland, said:

“Even where a director leaves the business in a position of financial stability, if the company were later to become insolvent, then any director who served during the three years running up to the insolvency could be subject to investigation.

“The impact of this could be far-reaching. For example, where a director has played a role in the company’s difficulties in those three years, they could be disqualified from being a director for up to fifteen years, which could prevent them from continuing in any subsequent role as a director.” 

Partner and head of our employment team, Karen Cole, added:

“For an MP, the resignation or dismissal may be very high profile, but it’s effectively a clean break. For a director, it’s important to be sure that any resignation takes account of the whole picture and they ensure that financial management and other corporate responsibilities are all in good order before they sign the exit paperwork, if they want to minimise any future risk of personal liability.”

For employment advice and corporate queries, contact Karen Cole or Victoria Holland today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more
  • Navigating the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023: What it means for your business
    The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (the Act) represents a significant shift in the UK's approach to combating economic crime, improving corporate transparency, and anti-mo


    Read more
  • Blowing kisses, not boundaries
    Tribunal clears air on workplace etiquette.


    Read more
  • Estate planning: How not to make mincemeat of it!
    The High Court has confirmed that a will handwritten on the back of two cardboard food packages is legally binding.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Leann Paris, March 2025
    “From the beginning to the end, the support we have received throughout the case with all the staff members has been far more than we expected, we got kept up to date with every single matter, I have had stressful few years but Charlotte and he

  • C Smith, March 2025
    “As executor of a will it was a relief for a solicitor to act on my behalf as though no disputes it was still a lengthy and complex process. It was dealt with mostly by Charlotte B. who kept me informed at all times. She explained the process c

  • Marc, March 2025
    “RIAA Barker Gillette were engaged to handle a real estate transaction with unusual circumstances. As a non-UK resident unfamiliar with English conveyancing procedures, I felt completely satisfied with the depth of the information and explanati

  • Leigh, March 2025
    “Instructed Martin on my first property purchase. He was a delight to work with, kept me informed and updated regularly. It was an incredibly smooth and quick process. Couldn’t be happier.”

  • Ms Brownell, March 2025
    “Patrick was amazing from start to finish. He made the process so easy, and explained each step in detail ahead of time so I’d understand what would happen and when. He was incredibly organized and noted every detail, calling out things t

Read more
Send this to a friend