Skip to main content

News story

January 28, 2022

Consumer credit and competition law reforms

Consumer legislation in England and Wales aims to maintain lower prices, produce better products and services and uphold consumer rights. However, this legislation is inadequate at protecting consumers, and reforms are due.

The proposed reforms aim to safeguard consumers’ cash and eradicate the exploitation of online customers, as economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic relies heavily on the markets and consumers’ confidence in them.

The regulator and its powers

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is the competition regulator in the UK. Current legislation is inadequate because the CMA is slow to act, and its sanctions are too weak to deter.

The government suggests that the reforms will give enhanced power to the CMA for breaches of consumer protection legislation such as increased financial penalties (up to 10% of a global turnover) and the ability to enforce consumer law directly rather than having to go through the process of taking the business to court.

The government hopes that the increased powers available to the CMA will hold businesses accountable and protect consumers from the following issues.

Subscription traps

The first issue identified for reform is subscription traps for online consumers, such as automatic subscription renewals and hidden fees.

In response to this commonly experienced issue, the government will start requiring businesses clearly to inform customers of what they are signing up for, the minimum contract terms and all relevant billing information. In addition, the proposal to make businesses allow the customer to choose whether to re-subscribe should tackle the problem of auto-renewal and make it easier to cancel subscriptions.

These changes are most likely to affect the digital services industry, and companies within that industry may need to alter their business models to accommodate the proposed changes.

Fake reviews

Another critical issue that threatens consumer confidence is online fake or misleading reviews. Not only do fake reviews distort the market, but they also undermine fair competition and ultimately undercut consumer trust in the market.

The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 prohibit these unfair practices by businesses. However, in its reforms, the government intends to make it illegal to pay someone to write or host a fake review.

Dodgy business tactics

The final issue the government intends to tackle with its reforms is ‘dodgy business tactics’. For example, companies use websites to display their products in a particular order to influence consumer choice. These tactics limit consumers’ ability to make informed choices and harm fair competition as businesses can pay to have their products feature highly on a trader’s website without disclosing this.

These reforms are essential because consumer trust is key to economic recovery. Fair market competition will assist both big and small businesses. It provides more opportunities and ensures that companies provide the best possible service to their customers and do not use unfair tactics to influence the market. However, these reforms are undetailed proposals, so which reforms, if any, are brought into legislation remains to be seen.

Contact corporate lawyer Victoria Holland to check your company complies with consumer law and is ready for any planned changes in legislation.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more

What they say...

  • Anon, April 2025
    “Whistleblowing dismissal claim and settlement negotiations I can not speak highly enough of this firm and [Patrick Simpson], they were not only understanding of my case needs they also worked with the up most integrity and professionalism to e

  • Patrick, April 2025
    “We had a long process handled by Charlotte & James from RIAA Barker Gillette. Even though we were outside the UK Charlotte & James we’re always available and we developed a great working relationship with them.They gave sound advice,

  • Leann Paris, March 2025
    “From the beginning to the end, the support we have received throughout the case with all the staff members has been far more than we expected, we got kept up to date with every single matter, I have had stressful few years but Charlotte and he

  • C Smith, March 2025
    “As executor of a will it was a relief for a solicitor to act on my behalf as though no disputes it was still a lengthy and complex process. It was dealt with mostly by Charlotte B. who kept me informed at all times. She explained the process c

  • Marc, March 2025
    “RIAA Barker Gillette were engaged to handle a real estate transaction with unusual circumstances. As a non-UK resident unfamiliar with English conveyancing procedures, I felt completely satisfied with the depth of the information and explanati

Read more
Send this to a friend