Skip to main content

Insight article

December 13, 2018

Caste discrimination at work

Caste is not currently one of the protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010 and therefore caste discrimination is not explicitly prohibited.

The term caste denotes a hereditary, endogamous (marrying within the group) community associated with a traditional occupation and ranked accordingly on a perceived scale of ritual purity.

For those unaware of the workings of the caste system, the terms can be baffling, with different names used to identify the lowest castes and different groups having different statuses depending on the caste system to which they belong.

In July 2018, the government published the outcome of a consultation on whether legislation was needed to protect against caste discrimination. The government decided that it would not legislate in this area but would rely on emerging case law. This means an arguably more laissez-faire approach of allowing case law to develop, in which it is argued that caste is covered by the current definitions of race or religious belief.

There is clearly an overlap between religious belief and race discrimination with caste discrimination, but the larger question will be whether some forms of caste discrimination will fall outside of the scope of either of these two forms of discrimination. Some castes are based on occupation or profession; therefore, individuals suffering the effects of this type of discrimination may not be protected.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission’s response to the government’s decision was:

“The government has missed a crucial opportunity to improve legal clarity and has taken a step back by looking to repeal the duty to include caste as an aspect of race in the Equality Act 2010. This is inconsistent with the UK’s international obligations to provide for separate and distinct protection for caste in our legislation.”

As things stand, those who claim to be victims of caste discrimination are now reliant on ‘caste discrimination’ being captured under race and/or ethnic origins within section 9 of the Equality Act 2010.

Where a claimant has been treated less favourably because they are believed to be a member of, or descended from, a separate race or ethnic group, the existing provisions of section 9 should come into play. However, whether this is an improvement on a statutory definition is questionable.

Call employment solicitor Karen Cole today if you have been affected by any of the issues raised in this article.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more
  • Navigating the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023: What it means for your business
    The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (the Act) represents a significant shift in the UK's approach to combating economic crime, improving corporate transparency, and anti-mo


    Read more
  • Blowing kisses, not boundaries
    Tribunal clears air on workplace etiquette.


    Read more
  • Estate planning: How not to make mincemeat of it!
    The High Court has confirmed that a will handwritten on the back of two cardboard food packages is legally binding.


    Read more

What they say...

  • C Smith, March 2025
    “As executor of a will it was a relief for a solicitor to act on my behalf as though no disputes it was still a lengthy and complex process. It was dealt with mostly by Charlotte B. who kept me informed at all times. She explained the process c

  • Marc, March 2025
    “RIAA Barker Gillette were engaged to handle a real estate transaction with unusual circumstances. As a non-UK resident unfamiliar with English conveyancing procedures, I felt completely satisfied with the depth of the information and explanati

  • Leigh, March 2025
    “Instructed Martin on my first property purchase. He was a delight to work with, kept me informed and updated regularly. It was an incredibly smooth and quick process. Couldn’t be happier.”

  • Ms Brownell, March 2025
    “Patrick was amazing from start to finish. He made the process so easy, and explained each step in detail ahead of time so I’d understand what would happen and when. He was incredibly organized and noted every detail, calling out things t

  • Roman Cassini, February 2025
    “Peter Wright – highly recommended solicitor, helped us though a complicated flat sale with consummate professionalism.”

Read more
Send this to a friend