Skip to main content

Insight article

January 13, 2015

A notice to quit served by one joint tenant can determine the tenancy

The Supreme Court has ruled that a notice to quit served by one joint tenant determines the tenancy and does not infringe European Human Rights.

The Supreme Court has ruled that a notice to quit served by one joint tenant determines the tenancy and does not infringe on European Human Rights.

In the case of Sims v Dacorum Borough Council, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against an earlier Court of Appeal decision. The Court held that the existing law allowed a joint secure tenant to end a tenancy unilaterally and would not interfere with the co-tenant’s rights under Article 8 (the right to respect home and family life) and Article 1 (the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions). Had the Supreme Court ruled the other way, a situation could have arisen whereby a tenant, having served a notice to quit, had to remain a tenant against their will, leading to other human rights questions.

Whilst this is a welcome relief to many housing authorities and private landlords, the specific wording in the tenancy agreement provided for determination by a single joint tenant, so it is advisable to check the wording of a tenancy agreement carefully where there are joint tenancies.

For more information, speak to property litigator Laura St-Gallay.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Can you make a WhatsApp will?
    Key legal requirements and future outlook.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Ian, April 2025
    “Martin and his team at Barker Gillette acted for us in our purchase and sale of property. The chain was lengthy and elements of the work became complex. Martin was tenacious and resolved to answer our queries as they arose. He handled all aspe

Read more
Send this to a friend
ReviewSolicitors