Skip to main content

Insight article

January 13, 2015

A notice to quit served by one joint tenant can determine the tenancy

The Supreme Court has ruled that a notice to quit served by one joint tenant determines the tenancy and does not infringe European Human Rights.

The Supreme Court has ruled that a notice to quit served by one joint tenant determines the tenancy and does not infringe on European Human Rights.

In the case of Sims v Dacorum Borough Council, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against an earlier Court of Appeal decision. The Court held that the existing law allowed a joint secure tenant to end a tenancy unilaterally and would not interfere with the co-tenant’s rights under Article 8 (the right to respect home and family life) and Article 1 (the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions). Had the Supreme Court ruled the other way, a situation could have arisen whereby a tenant, having served a notice to quit, had to remain a tenant against their will, leading to other human rights questions.

Whilst this is a welcome relief to many housing authorities and private landlords, the specific wording in the tenancy agreement provided for determination by a single joint tenant, so it is advisable to check the wording of a tenancy agreement carefully where there are joint tenancies.

For more information, speak to property litigator Laura St-Gallay.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Family mediation and child arrangements
    What to do when you separate and there is no agreement in place for the children?


    Read more
  • Is your business acquisition ready?
    Is your business ready for an acquisition? Learn key considerations from corporate lawyer Evangelos Kyveris at RIAA Barker Gillette, including growth strategy alignment, financial readiness, logistical preparation, and professional assistance for a s


    Read more
  • Preventing sexual harassment
    Employers are facing a pivotal moment as they brace for new regulations regarding sexual harassment set to take effect in October 2024.


    Read more
  • Why employers need a reflective response to employee beliefs
    Recent tribunal judgments on the freedom to express gender-critical views highlight the growing challenge for employers in safely navigating discrimination in the workplace in the face of increasingly complex social attitudes.


    Read more
  • A spotlight on child arrangements in the UK
    Celebrating National Children’s Day.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Georgina, July 2024
    “We used Peter Wright to act as a conveyancing solicitor in a recent house purchase. We found him approachable, affordable, would return calls, give any necessary advice without being intrusive, and was very thorough in all investigations on th

  • Oggy, July 2024
    “An excellent, professional and importantly, symapthetic service imparted to me from Karen at a most stressful time.” Employment

  • Sarah and Luke Oubridge, July 2024
    “We could not be more happy with the service provided by Herman and his team. From start to finish, we felt listened to, understood and also shared a laugh. Huge thanks.” Wills, tax and trusts

  • Tim Blunn, June 2024
    “My Solicitor (Patrick Simpson) was easy to speak to and very informative throughout my case. I would 100% recommend RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) LLP for employment related issues.”

  • Sabrina, June 2024
    “…mentioned a few complex areas and I appreciated the honesty and clear guidance provided. I would recommend [Pippa Marshall] highly.” Family law – prenup advice

Read more