Skip to main content

News story

January 13, 2017

Getting to work amidst travel chaos and disruption

There are several reasons why employees may have trouble getting to work because of major disruptions. The common cause recently is the ASLEF and RMT strikes affecting Southern and Gatwick Express train services, with the next bout of strikes planned for 24, 25 and 27 January. On Monday, tube strikes also affected commuters having a massive impact on businesses in London. And with today’s weather both ice and snow are affecting the roads and public transport around the country. The question is what can employers do?

Develop a strategy for travel chaos

Employers must develop a strategy for dealing with major travel disruptions. The strategy should be twofold: how to ensure business continuity if a significant proportion of staff are absent; and how to deal with staff management issues, including whether to pay absent staff, whether to allow staff to work at home and how to keep in contact with them.

Health and safety concerns

Employers should consider health and safety concerns of employees during difficult periods.

Section 44 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996) states that an employee has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done because:

  • in circumstances of danger which the employee reasonably believed to be serious and imminent and which he could not reasonably have been expected to avert, he left (or proposed to leave) or (while the danger persisted) refused to return to his place of work or any dangerous part of his place of work; or
  • in circumstances of danger which the employee reasonably believed to be serious and imminent, he took (or proposed to take) appropriate steps to protect himself or other persons from the danger.

Employers should be wary of ignoring employees’ health and safety concerns in relation to any adverse weather conditions and should have a clear policy in place.

Should employees who cannot get to work be paid?

The answer depends on the right not to suffer unlawful deductions from wages and the employee’s express and implied contractual rights.

Is docking pay an unlawful deduction from wages?

It is unlawful to make a deduction from a worker’s wages unless the deduction is authorised by statute, a contractual term that has been notified to the worker in writing, or by the worker having given their prior written consent.

However, the absence of such authority is not always conclusive. The first step is to confirm whether there has been a “deduction” at all, and there will be no deduction unless the employee can establish some legal right to be paid.

The key issue is to decide if there is a contractual right to be paid if the employee cannot attend work. This will require a careful review of the employment contract and what takes place in practice.

Should employers pay employees for absences caused by travel chaos?

Aside from the legal uncertainty in not paying an employee, there are many business reasons to pay employees even if they cannot come to work.

Employee relations

ACAS encourages a “flexible” approach:

“The handling of bad weather and travel disruption can be an opportunity for an employer to enhance staff morale and productivity by the way it is handled.”

Not paying employees may lead to bad feelings towards the employer and those who could work from home and get paid.

Bad publicity

Larger employers should certainly consider the risk of adverse press coverage.

Abuse of sick leave

Some employees may be tempted to falsely call in sick, hoping to claim company sick pay. This may lead to a breakdown of trust, as well as resentment by more honest colleagues.

However, there is, as always, a flip side to the coin. Paying staff whether they work or not can cause difficulties. It may encourage some not to make the effort whilst others will try to get to work and will feel hard done by if their colleagues are being paid to stay at home. It is important in those situations to ensure employees who turn up for work believe their efforts have been recognised.

What are the alternatives?

Homeworking and other workplaces: In many businesses, working from home may be possible for some employees. Managers and employees should plan to take work home if disruption is forecast.

Where an employer operates at more than one office, it may consider sending employees to another closer to their home.

Workplace closure

In some cases, depending on weather conditions or the number of stranded employees, it may not be economical or even safe for a workplace to remain open. If an employer decides to close a workplace, it may be able to send employees to another workplace or ask them to work from home. Any employees with contractually guaranteed hours or salary will still have to be paid if they are ready and willing to work unless the employer can rely on contractual terms.

Paid annual leave

The employer may want to allow employees to take the absence caused by travel chaos as paid annual leave, assuming they have sufficient entitlement remaining.

Alternatively, an employer may decide it wants to force all absent employees to take annual leave. However, employers need to bear in mind Regulation 15 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR); requiring notice to be given to employees in advance if the employer wants to force them to take holiday from their statutory holiday entitlement. Notice must be twice as long as the period of leave e.g. one day’s holiday needs two full days’ notice, and a week’s holiday needs two weeks’ notice.

Designating absence as holiday without giving the necessary notice under the WTR needs a specific power, usually found in the employment contract or the employee’s explicit consent in writing.

Making up the hours

Employees who do not want to take annual leave or unpaid leave could be asked to make up for the lost hours caused by travel chaos on other days.

Time off for dependants

Employees have a right to take a “reasonable” amount of time off because of the unexpected disruption or termination of a dependant’s care arrangements (ERA 1996). Bad weather or other disruption might cause schools and nurseries to close because an employee must take the day off to look after children.

In that instance, employers cannot force the employee to use paid annual leave entitlement and must not subject the employee to any detriment because of exercising the right. However, the employee has no statutory right to be paid for the time off.

Time-limited paid leave

An alternative is to give limited paid leave, after which employees must either take unpaid leave, make up the lost hours, or agree to count it against their paid holiday entitlement.

Cover for absent staff

Many workplaces, particularly hospitals and other emergency services, must arrange to cover absent employees to maintain adequate service levels. The strict rules on rest periods under the WTR are likely to be waived in those cases, but employers should ensure that employees are given compensatory rest and that their working hours do not present a health and safety risk.

Practical steps to reduce business risk during travel chaos

  • Develop a business continuity plan. Plan for worst-case scenarios, and the plan should work for more minor disruptions.
  • Consider including a clause in employment contracts to specifically authorise deductions from wages if this is the approach the employer wishes to take.
  • Implement a policy outlining how the employer will deal with adverse weather and other major travel disruptions.
  • Publicise the policy internally before any travel disruption, and ensure all staff and managers know their responsibilities.

Call Karen Cole on 020 7299 6909 or email her at karen.cole@riaabg.com for more information.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • What is the Employment Rights Bill 2024?
    The Employment Rights Bill 2024 marks a pivotal moment in UK employment law, promising the most significant reforms in over three decades


    Read more
  • Autumn Budget Statement 2024
    Key implications for employment law, property law, and estate planning


    Read more
  • Disclosure against warranties in UK corporate transactions
    In UK corporate transactions, disclosure of information is a vital strategy for sellers to shield themselves from warranty claims when selling their shares or business.


    Read more
  • How the Employment Rights Bill 2024 impacts employers and businesses
    The government’s new Employment Rights Bill outlines significant changes to employment laws, focusing on workers' rights and flexibility.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Autumn/Winter 2024 Edition


    Read more

What they say...

  • Nim, November 2024
    “I highly recommend James McMullan and his team. They all did a fantastic job with helping me through a particularly difficult family situation. They are extremely professional, caring, and experts in their field.” Probate and contentious

  • Man Kiu Wan, November 2024
    “Thank you Charlotte for your excellent and professional services.” Probate

  • Ms K, November 2024
    “I was recently made redundant, and my company had handled some of the process quite poorly. Patrick came recommended by a friend who had used him during her own redundancy, and I can now wholeheartedly recommend him myself. His initial consult

  • Sean Greathead, October 2024
    “Karen Cole has been superb in supporting us in dealing with some complex legal challenges. Her advice and guidance is timely, well communicated and provides direction on resolving the situations on hand. I would highly recommend Karen and the

  • Jonny Grossman, October 2024
    “Martin was everything I would expect a top solicitor to be. He was knowledgeable, responsive, supportive, calm, and overall an excellent professional to work with. I would use Martin and RIAA Barker Gillette again without hesitation. Sharon is

Read more
Send this to a friend